From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [perf/x86] 81ec3f3c4c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -5.5% regression
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:58:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200205125804.GM14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200205123216.GO12867@shao2-debian>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 08:32:16PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -5.5% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 81ec3f3c4c4d78f2d3b6689c9816bfbdf7417dbb ("perf/x86: Add check_period PMU callback")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
I'm fairly sure this bisect/result is bogus.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-05 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-05 12:32 [perf/x86] 81ec3f3c4c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -5.5% regression kernel test robot
2020-02-05 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-02-06 3:04 ` [LKP] " Li, Philip
2020-02-21 8:03 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-21 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-21 13:20 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-23 14:11 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-23 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 0:33 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-24 1:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 1:58 ` Huang, Ying
2020-02-24 2:19 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-24 13:20 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-24 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 19:42 ` Kleen, Andi
2020-02-24 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 21:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-24 21:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-24 21:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-24 22:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-25 2:57 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-25 3:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-25 4:53 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-23 19:36 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-21 18:05 ` Kleen, Andi
2020-02-22 12:43 ` Feng Tang
2020-02-22 17:08 ` Kleen, Andi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200205125804.GM14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).