From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63129C352A3 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 12:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1C520720 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 12:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="Gp+sYlwA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727032AbgBGMdm (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2020 07:33:42 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:53898 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726860AbgBGMdm (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2020 07:33:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=F2SfjhQs22QFPd1xeRI15B/VRdcmSSr0GH0YnucUn2g=; b=Gp+sYlwAODpNjTJCocTvwpV52l Dss3unYROvlVeiN8qdQMuy2mTHBeGVCfGuh5F889JHAsIGlbB8yMBmqicbVbN6cpHwuqafD5+21/g IRJ8KgG7ncN8EW1lljjoaMlLTI0ru9fFF9Frtmxxesfj5WSOVfTWIE7MwrhVQESa53X8TayFq8uWC 63d001cxSBDtEe4B9R44vOQmnoYDQpMxE69XLIdRhuvpoP0SWzR2PkZ2nooQttMrvndWi3ud1V++f WF3snyB0i5ZCeC05mS9RNP00OenHxTwyDhLWHg7Iqy0lFkxzqkWgYg1WStAhht1JV6z0K5iQ4vpSc FEkv5vFQ==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j02pE-0008Bw-Qz; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 12:33:36 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28AF330258F; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 13:31:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 07D922B835767; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 13:33:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 13:33:35 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-m68k , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Will Deacon , Michael Schmitz , Greg Ungerer , joe@perches.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com Subject: Re: Checkpatch being daft, Was: [PATCH -v2 08/10] m68k,mm: Extend table allocator for multiple sizes Message-ID: <20200207123334.GT14946@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20200131124531.623136425@infradead.org> <20200131125403.882175409@infradead.org> <20200207113417.GG14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200207123035.GI14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200207123035.GI14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:30:35PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:11:54PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:34 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:56:40AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > WARNING: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author 'Peter > > > > Zijlstra ' > > > > (in all patches) > > > > > > > > I can fix that (the From?) up while applying. > > > > > > I'm not sure where that warning comes from, but if you feel it needs > > > fixing, sure. I normally only add the (Intel) thing to the SoB. I've so > > > far never had complaints about that. > > > > Checkpatch doesn't like this. > > Ooh, I see, that's a relatively new warning, pretty daft if you ask me. > > Now I have to rediscover how I went about teaching checkpatch to STFU ;-) > > Joe, should that '$email eq $author' not ignore rfc822 comments? That Argh, that's me hitting on the wrong 'nominal' in checkpatch.pl, same difference though. > is: > > Peter Zijlstra > > and: > > Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > > are, in actual fact, the same.