From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Monakhov <dmtrmonakhov@yandex-team.ru>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/watchdog: flush all printk nmi buffers when hardlockup detected
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:15:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200212011551.GA13208@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158132813726.1980.17382047082627699898.stgit@buzz>
On (20/02/10 12:48), Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>
> In NMI context printk() could save messages into per-cpu buffers and
> schedule flush by irq_work when IRQ are unblocked. This means message
> about hardlockup appears in kernel log only when/if lockup is gone.
>
> Comment in irq_work_queue_on() states that remote IPI aren't NMI safe
> thus printk() cannot schedule flush work to another cpu.
>
> This patch adds simple atomic counter of detected hardlockups and
> flushes all per-cpu printk buffers in context softlockup watchdog
> at any other cpu when it sees changes of this counter.
Petr, could you remind me, why do we do PRINTK_NMI_DIRECT_CONTEXT_MASK
only from ftrace?
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-12 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-10 9:48 [PATCH] kernel/watchdog: flush all printk nmi buffers when hardlockup detected Konstantin Khlebnikov
2020-02-10 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2020-02-11 11:01 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2020-02-11 8:14 ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-02-11 12:36 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2020-02-12 14:54 ` Petr Mladek
2020-02-13 13:05 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2020-02-12 1:15 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2020-02-12 2:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-12 3:04 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-02-12 3:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-12 14:18 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200212011551.GA13208@google.com \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmtrmonakhov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).