From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, gustavo@embeddedor.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, paulmck@kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] tracing vs rcu vs nmi
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:09:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200212100940.GD14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200212093210.468391728@infradead.org>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:32:10AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> These here patches are the result of Mathieu and Steve trying to get commit
> 865e63b04e9b2 ("tracing: Add back in rcu_irq_enter/exit_irqson() for rcuidle
> tracepoints") reverted again.
>
> One of the things discovered is that tracing MUST NOT happen before nmi_enter()
> or after nmi_exit(). I've only fixed x86, but quickly gone through other
> architectures and there is definitely more stuff to be fixed (simply grep for
> nmi_enter in your arch).
Someone should probably look at the whole ARM FiQ stuff, I got a little
lost, but probably handle_fiq_as_nmi() wants notrace and everything
using set_fiq_handler() wants looking at.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-12 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-12 9:32 [PATCH 0/8] tracing vs rcu vs nmi Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 9:32 ` [PATCH 1/8] rcu: Rename rcu_irq_{enter,exit}_irqson() Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 9:32 ` [PATCH 2/8] rcu: Mark rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs() inline Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 9:32 ` [PATCH 3/8] rcu,tracing: Create trace_rcu_{enter,exit}() Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 9:32 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched,rcu,tracing: Mark preempt_count_{add,sub}() notrace Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 14:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-12 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 15:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-12 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 9:32 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86,tracing: Mark debug_stack_{set_zero,reset)() notrace Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 14:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-12 15:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 15:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-12 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 9:32 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf,tracing: Prepare the perf-trace interface for RCU changes Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 14:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-12 15:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-02-12 9:32 ` [PATCH 7/8] tracing: Employ trace_rcu_{enter,exit}() Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 9:32 ` [PATCH 8/8] tracing: Remove regular RCU context for _rcuidle tracepoints (again) Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 14:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-12 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 10:01 ` [PATCH 0/8] tracing vs rcu vs nmi Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 10:56 ` Will Deacon
2020-02-12 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 14:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-12 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 10:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-12 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200212100940.GD14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).