From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8A0C3B18C for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 20:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A612467E for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 20:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="UUEAaBo8" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728412AbgBMUMv (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:12:51 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:33727 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728100AbgBMUMu (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:12:50 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id n7so3626789pfn.0 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:12:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Em2FaAYttibjTQlPuyOTgle0cIehhPkcJObsB7mmxQ4=; b=UUEAaBo8QzHRBzSTg5vwmEwtBZHIqo8GM6h67erAyXq9FaDWBAU6ir6JHFm5b5diIV HGWsJNDUrBMq8XkvSBRBNdSSnVo7QRrvOMGbMi4++YLam3x4bpheUpxPqL0nIVQiGhM5 wFBYyGzAdq57vTFYJhluzz5kWAZTiuunHzIg4nV6XVmMowY494/FBW7F+k7invAvbZ0u 349HgFlf3nLnrDlGAeeclZeyHNlXZAVUx2AJjjZQ8m74wI1MglsOpM3/jwU+jMgBt49d KKo78LddH450ayeAYP+lbVv7jKVJwUjYpvPpYqdDXM4aBjH7FlHFOH+2XRGqs9w9YhTy sGyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Em2FaAYttibjTQlPuyOTgle0cIehhPkcJObsB7mmxQ4=; b=tMIfDBgxE2xdQR/1mUG1W2CJYgT9cTUgxlsNVPop7CJxvZjoU4qCkRZq7zG8B4dKs+ kwRpzfGdUQfFxfkwyvgvgtwBreYTKNuTYIAJMQ1lcTaRs0Rd9PAn/uWLYei88jXEUd93 MJW7k8NuoRK/0aPRzqZQlC4DAJxjMMGk5T6iP5qgVe2gv2xdHcnlNjdcFDZlYZYy+3Lo zQC1fIYwGGx0Gei5leeEv7gQGRVNCIhYYMhIsyqf3KBeMOkw87atuM8QYxa540I4EhO6 4fF4KAzeD6HBxemNdz4CWRIh6rDjnyix8McUeaf2xv3in/6VOc50Uc11WSrfZ9SGElj6 3kng== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVtUfrsgXwNEDACBd5Udgfq49Pirn4BN/XrpNlYrTSH3Ofzx1NG fLVdpu2JuguAgqL74iMtqVFxEg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6C2//bSkNXWpg1QFzaCdhtdkUlSkJBK805RDsjAufMVdJhjl5udMwJOsTXCI9bhdi8VtmPg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8703:: with SMTP id b3mr14998134pfo.67.1581624769948; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:12:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from builder (104-188-17-28.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net. [104.188.17.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u23sm3988269pfm.29.2020.02.13.12.12.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:12:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:12:47 -0800 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Matthias Kaehlcke Cc: Dikshita Agarwal , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vgarodia@codeaurora.org, Odelu Kukatla Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] Enable video on sc7180 Message-ID: <20200213201247.GQ3948@builder> References: <1579006416-11599-1-git-send-email-dikshita@codeaurora.org> <20200203180240.GD3948@builder> <20200213185305.GF50449@google.com> <20200213192627.GA1455@tuxbook-pro> <20200213195725.GH50449@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200213195725.GH50449@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 13 Feb 11:57 PST 2020, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:26:27AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Thu 13 Feb 10:53 PST 2020, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > > > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:02:40AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > > On Tue 14 Jan 04:53 PST 2020, Dikshita Agarwal wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > Changes since v3: > > > > > > > > > > - addressed DT and DT schema review comments. > > > > > > > > > > - renamed DT schema file. > > > > > > > > > > v3 can be found at [1]. > > > > > These changes depend on patch series [2] - [6]. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Dikshita > > > > > > > > > > > > > Picked up the dts patches for 5.7, with Stan's acks > > > > > > I can't seem to find the patches in the QCOM repo, neither in > > > 'arm64-for-5.7' nor 'for-next'. Am I looking at the wrong place or > > > maybe you forget to push these? > > > > > > > Thanks for the question Matthias, I was looking for this email as I > > rebased onto v5.6-rc1 earlier this week, but got distracted. > > > > I pulled them in, but in the rebase I realized that we don't have the > > interconnects in place, so in it's current form these patches doesn't > > compile. > > > > Seems we're waiting for rather trivial respin of > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1577782737-32068-1-git-send-email-okukatla@codeaurora.org/ > > to get this settled. > > Hm, there has been no response to the comments in more than a month, also > the series depends on another ('Split SDM845 interconnect nodes and > consolidate RPMh support' https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=238831), > even though that isn't mentioned anywhere. > Sibi is revisiting David's 845 series, so my expectation is that it will land in this cycle. > IIUC the interconnect configuration isn't strictly required to get the > video codec to work. I wonder if it would make sense to respin this > series to remove the interconnect properties. They could be added in a > separate patch after the ICC support has landed. > > Dikshita/Bjorn, what do you think? That sounds likely. Dikshita, can you confirm that we can just omit the interconnect lines from the patch and I'll just apply the patches again without these (and you can follow up with adding interconnects later). Regards, Bjorn