From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] tools/memory-model: Add litmus tests for atomic APIs
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:39:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200214233921.GA110915@debian-boqun.qqnc3lrjykvubdpftowmye0fmh.lx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.2002141024141.1579-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:27:44AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, Boqun Feng wrote:
>
> > A recent discussion raises up the requirement for having test cases for
> > atomic APIs:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200213085849.GL14897@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/
> >
> > , and since we already have a way to generate a test module from a
> > litmus test with klitmus[1]. It makes sense that we add more litmus
> > tests for atomic APIs into memory-model.
>
> It might be worth discussing this point a little more fully. The
I'm open to any suggestion, and ...
> set of tests in tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ is deliberately rather
> limited. Paul has a vastly more expansive set of litmus tests in a
I'm OK if we want to limit the number of litmus tests in
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests directory. But ...
> GitHub repository, and I am doubtful about how many new tests we want
> to keep in the kernel source.
>
I think we all agree we want to use litmus tests as much as possbile for
discussing locking/parallel programming/memory model related problems,
right? This is benefical for both kernel and the herd tool, as they can
improve each other.
Atomic APIs (perhaps even {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), smp_load_acquire() and
smp_store_release()) have been longing for some more concrete examples
as a complement for the semantics description in the docs, so that
people can check their understandings. Further, with the help of
klitmus, the litmus tests can be a useful tool for testing if a new arch
support is added to kernel. That's why I plan to add litmus tests into
kernel source.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Boqun
> Perhaps it makes sense to have tests corresponding to all the examples
> in Documentation/, perhaps not. How do people feel about this?
>
> Alan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-14 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-14 4:01 [RFC 0/3] tools/memory-model: Add litmus tests for atomic APIs Boqun Feng
2020-02-14 4:01 ` [RFC 1/3] Documentation/locking/atomic: Fix atomic-set litmus test Boqun Feng
2020-02-14 4:01 ` [RFC 2/3] tools/memory-model: Add a litmus test for atomic_set() Boqun Feng
2020-02-14 8:12 ` Andrea Parri
2020-02-14 10:40 ` Boqun Feng
2020-02-25 7:34 ` Boqun Feng
2020-02-25 13:01 ` Luc Maranget
2020-02-25 21:42 ` More on reader-writer locks Alan Stern
2020-02-26 9:46 ` Luc Maranget
2020-02-26 2:51 ` [RFC 2/3] tools/memory-model: Add a litmus test for atomic_set() Boqun Feng
2020-02-14 15:47 ` Alan Stern
2020-02-14 23:52 ` Boqun Feng
2020-02-17 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-14 4:01 ` [RFC 3/3] tools/memory-model: Add litmus test for RMW + smp_mb__after_atomic() Boqun Feng
2020-02-14 6:15 ` Boqun Feng
2020-02-14 8:18 ` Andrea Parri
2020-02-14 8:20 ` Boqun Feng
2020-02-14 15:58 ` Alan Stern
2020-02-15 0:09 ` Boqun Feng
2020-02-14 9:55 ` [RFC 0/3] tools/memory-model: Add litmus tests for atomic APIs Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-14 10:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-14 15:27 ` Alan Stern
2020-02-14 23:39 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2020-02-15 15:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-16 5:43 ` Boqun Feng
2020-02-16 12:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-16 16:16 ` Alan Stern
2020-02-17 1:27 ` Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200214233921.GA110915@debian-boqun.qqnc3lrjykvubdpftowmye0fmh.lx.internal.cloudapp.net \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).