From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E03C35242 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 00:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4BC2083B for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 00:43:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581727408; bh=n6C+XIf/lyMg45xZwpa1Z0/jdjqPoKgJmPJKvllOVUA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=UrtKQ6hlIX8M2tGMR3pogVoSQVETef4rbZ9rc8sJN+KOx7Ys1pg2Rtu2NrXsXVqeM kl9JrzlitU2Ky0Wgwlq9vb78fxmk8jqQmjHdMw2IDzALCScscsW95kIR2+TFuB0Hbv TbIcPQNR1HzYjcdN6lXle0K6AfiXcw6MyAIF9K68= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727924AbgBOAn1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:43:27 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49686 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727567AbgBOAn1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:43:27 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [38.98.37.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBBE2206CC; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 00:43:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581727406; bh=n6C+XIf/lyMg45xZwpa1Z0/jdjqPoKgJmPJKvllOVUA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bbec4k4QJ+/R5/1/51+pxAbRNaT7gXuJc2Z6YvAWwm9f/+Z8khItpYP1e09K0+7WG tOQ7oLR+uWzZY3zIqswcVkQU29KAvHTlAKk6ywep8desuYFROSRafpujca5Y4IfnPb 5TNF5zZIMkU9txujwR7X+f2yRlc9+gdEBVRQzPYQ= Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:05:00 -0500 From: Greg KH To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ranjani Sridharan , vkoul@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, jank@cadence.com, slawomir.blauciak@intel.com, Bard liao , Rander Wang Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] soundwire: add master_device/driver support Message-ID: <20200215000500.GB5524@kroah.com> References: <20200201042011.5781-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20200214164919.GB4016987@kroah.com> <0ec41a5b-6132-6940-f1b3-bac1724b70a4@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0ec41a5b-6132-6940-f1b3-bac1724b70a4@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 05:34:40PM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > My preference in terms of integration in drivers/soundwire would be > > 1. Intel DAI cleanup (only one kfree missing, will resubmit v3 today) > > 2. [PATCH 00/10] soundwire: bus: fix race conditions, add suspend-resume > this series solves a lot of issues and should go first. > > 3. ASoC/SOF integration (still with platform devices) > I narrowed this down to 6 patches, that would help me submit the rest of the > ASoC/SOF patches in Mark Brown's tree. That would be Intel specific. This > step would be the first where everything SoundWire-related can be enabled in > a build, and while we've caught a lot of cross-compilation issues it's > likely some bots will find corner cases to keep us busy. > > 4. master_device/driver transition: these updated patches removing platform > devices + sysfs support + Qualcomm support (the last point would depend on > the workload/support of Qualcomm/Linaro folks, I don't want to commit on > their behalf). > > 5. New SoundWire functionality for Intel platforms (clock-stop/restart and > synchronized links). The code would be only located in drivers/soundwire and > be easier to handle. For the synchronized links we still have a bit of > validation work to do so it should really come last. > > Would this work for everyone? Sounds reasonable to me, but patches would show it best to see if there are any issues :) thanks, greg k-h