linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	"Antoine Ténart" <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: macb: Properly handle phylink on at91rm9200
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:56:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200217165644.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200217104348.43164-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:43:48AM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> at91ether_init was handling the phy mode and speed but since the switch to
> phylink, the NCFGR register got overwritten by macb_mac_config().

I don't think this actually explains anything - or at least I can't
make sense of it with respect to your patch.

You claim that the NCFGR register gets overwritten in macb_mac_config(),
but I see that the NCFGR register is read-modify-write in there,
whereas your new implementation below doesn't bother reading the
present value.

I think the issue you're referring to is the clearing of the PAE bit,
which is also the RM9200_RMII for at91rm9200?

Next, there's some duplication of code introduced here - it seems
that the tail end of macb_mac_link_down() and at91ether_mac_link_down()
are identical, as are the tail end of macb_mac_link_up() and
at91ether_mac_link_up().

> Add new phylink callbacks to handle emac and at91rm9200 properly.
> 
> Fixes: 7897b071ac3b ("net: macb: convert to phylink")
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> ---

I posted a heads-up message last week about updates to phylink that
I'll be submitting soon (most of the prerequisits have now been sent
for review) which touch every phylink_mac_ops-using piece of code in
the tree.  Unfortunately, this patch introduces a new instance that
likely isn't going to get my attention, so it's going to create a
subtle merge conflict between net-next and net trees unless we work
out some way to deal with it.

I'm just mentioning that so that some thought can be applied now
rather than when it actually happens - especially as I've no way to
test the changes that will be necessary for this driver.

>  drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h      |  1 +
>  drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h
> index dbf7070fcdba..a3f0f27fc79a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h
> @@ -652,6 +652,7 @@
>  #define MACB_CAPS_GEM_HAS_PTP			0x00000040
>  #define MACB_CAPS_BD_RD_PREFETCH		0x00000080
>  #define MACB_CAPS_NEEDS_RSTONUBR		0x00000100
> +#define MACB_CAPS_MACB_IS_EMAC			0x08000000
>  #define MACB_CAPS_FIFO_MODE			0x10000000
>  #define MACB_CAPS_GIGABIT_MODE_AVAILABLE	0x20000000
>  #define MACB_CAPS_SG_DISABLED			0x40000000
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> index def94e91883a..529a1d0d7dab 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> @@ -654,6 +654,72 @@ static const struct phylink_mac_ops macb_phylink_ops = {
>  	.mac_link_up = macb_mac_link_up,
>  };
>  
> +static void at91ether_mac_config(struct phylink_config *config,
> +				 unsigned int mode,
> +				 const struct phylink_link_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct net_device *ndev = to_net_dev(config->dev);
> +	struct macb *bp = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 ctrl;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&bp->lock, flags);
> +
> +	ctrl = MACB_BF(CLK, MACB_CLK_DIV32) | MACB_BIT(BIG);
> +	if (state->speed == SPEED_100)
> +		ctrl |= MACB_BIT(SPD);
> +
> +	if (state->duplex)
> +		ctrl |= MACB_BIT(FD);
> +
> +	if (state->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII)
> +		ctrl |= MACB_BIT(RM9200_RMII);
> +
> +	macb_writel(bp, NCFGR, ctrl);
> +
> +	bp->speed = state->speed;
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bp->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void at91ether_mac_link_down(struct phylink_config *config,
> +				    unsigned int mode,
> +				    phy_interface_t interface)
> +{
> +	struct net_device *ndev = to_net_dev(config->dev);
> +	struct macb *bp = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	u32 ctrl;
> +
> +	/* Disable Rx and Tx */
> +	ctrl = macb_readl(bp, NCR) & ~(MACB_BIT(RE) | MACB_BIT(TE));
> +	macb_writel(bp, NCR, ctrl);
> +
> +	netif_tx_stop_all_queues(ndev);
> +}
> +
> +static void at91ether_mac_link_up(struct phylink_config *config,
> +				  unsigned int mode,
> +				  phy_interface_t interface,
> +				  struct phy_device *phy)
> +{
> +	struct net_device *ndev = to_net_dev(config->dev);
> +	struct macb *bp = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +
> +	/* Enable Rx and Tx */
> +	macb_writel(bp, NCR, macb_readl(bp, NCR) | MACB_BIT(RE) | MACB_BIT(TE));
> +
> +	netif_tx_wake_all_queues(ndev);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct phylink_mac_ops at91ether_phylink_ops = {
> +	.validate = macb_validate,
> +	.mac_pcs_get_state = macb_mac_pcs_get_state,
> +	.mac_an_restart = macb_mac_an_restart,
> +	.mac_config = at91ether_mac_config,
> +	.mac_link_down = at91ether_mac_link_down,
> +	.mac_link_up = at91ether_mac_link_up,
> +};
> +
>  static bool macb_phy_handle_exists(struct device_node *dn)
>  {
>  	dn = of_parse_phandle(dn, "phy-handle", 0);
> @@ -695,13 +761,17 @@ static int macb_phylink_connect(struct macb *bp)
>  /* based on au1000_eth. c*/
>  static int macb_mii_probe(struct net_device *dev)
>  {
> +	const struct phylink_mac_ops *phylink_ops = &macb_phylink_ops;
>  	struct macb *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
>  
> +	if (bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_MACB_IS_EMAC)
> +		phylink_ops = &at91ether_phylink_ops;
> +
>  	bp->phylink_config.dev = &dev->dev;
>  	bp->phylink_config.type = PHYLINK_NETDEV;
>  
>  	bp->phylink = phylink_create(&bp->phylink_config, bp->pdev->dev.fwnode,
> -				     bp->phy_interface, &macb_phylink_ops);
> +				     bp->phy_interface, phylink_ops);
>  	if (IS_ERR(bp->phylink)) {
>  		netdev_err(dev, "Could not create a phylink instance (%ld)\n",
>  			   PTR_ERR(bp->phylink));
> @@ -4041,7 +4111,6 @@ static int at91ether_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct net_device *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	struct macb *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
>  	int err;
> -	u32 reg;
>  
>  	bp->queues[0].bp = bp;
>  
> @@ -4055,12 +4124,6 @@ static int at91ether_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	macb_writel(bp, NCR, 0);
>  
> -	reg = MACB_BF(CLK, MACB_CLK_DIV32) | MACB_BIT(BIG);
> -	if (bp->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII)
> -		reg |= MACB_BIT(RM9200_RMII);
> -
> -	macb_writel(bp, NCFGR, reg);
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -4218,7 +4281,7 @@ static const struct macb_config sama5d4_config = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct macb_config emac_config = {
> -	.caps = MACB_CAPS_NEEDS_RSTONUBR,
> +	.caps = MACB_CAPS_NEEDS_RSTONUBR | MACB_CAPS_MACB_IS_EMAC,
>  	.clk_init = at91ether_clk_init,
>  	.init = at91ether_init,
>  };
> -- 
> 2.24.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-17 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-17 10:43 [PATCH net] net: macb: Properly handle phylink on at91rm9200 Alexandre Belloni
2020-02-17 16:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-02-17 17:06   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-02-17 17:42   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-02-17 18:47     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-02-17 22:03 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-02-21 17:10   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200217165644.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).