From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D59C3404D for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BD821D56 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726817AbgBSKpb (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 05:45:31 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:33756 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726469AbgBSKpb (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 05:45:31 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BF5C2DC; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 03:45:23 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Stephen Kitt Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] docs: sysctl/kernel.rst rework Message-ID: <20200219034523.773492e6@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20200218125923.685-1-steve@sk2.org> References: <20200218125923.685-1-steve@sk2.org> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:59:15 +0100 Stephen Kitt wrote: > A recent discussion about differences in the "panic" description in > sysctl/kernel.rst led me to look into completing that file, and it > turned out that more work was needed than documenting "panic". This > patch series is the first batch, making the resulting documentation > hopefully nicer and more accurate. It doesn't add fields that are > present in 5.5 but not documented; I've started adding these, but I'd > rather submit them individually once the basic kernel.rst is > committed, to make it easier to request review from the appropriate > maintainers (each patch adding documentation should be mergeable > separately, without needing a patch series). OK, I've applied everything except #7, which I commented on separately. Thanks, jon