From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>,
artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Fix synth event test to avoid using smp_processor_id()
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:24:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200221192419.ce690df36a60d46da5d6d866@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200220174801.2b793ae1@gandalf.local.home>
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:48:01 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:52:29 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Since smp_processor_id() requires irq-disabled or preempt-disabled,
> > synth event generation test module made some warnings. To prevent
> > that, use get_cpu()/put_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
>
> I just noticed this patch, after applying my version that just uses the
> raw_smp_processor_id(). We don't really care what CPU it is do we?
>
> I didn't want a test to muck with preemption disabling and all that fun.
OK, I confirmed that the ring_buffer_nest_start() ensures the preempt
disabled. So just using raw_smp_processor_id() is good to me.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-21 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-17 9:52 [PATCH 0/2] tracing: Fix synthetic event generation API and test Masami Hiramatsu
2020-02-17 9:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Fix synth event test to avoid using smp_processor_id() Masami Hiramatsu
2020-02-20 22:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-20 22:56 ` Tom Zanussi
2020-02-21 10:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2020-02-17 9:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clear trace_state when starting trace Masami Hiramatsu
2020-02-18 15:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] tracing: Fix synthetic event generation API and test Tom Zanussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200221192419.ce690df36a60d46da5d6d866@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).