linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/15] driver: xen: Replace cpu_up/down with device_online/offline
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 19:29:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200223192942.18420-12-qais.yousef@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200223192942.18420-1-qais.yousef@arm.com>

The core device API performs extra housekeeping bits that are missing
from directly calling cpu_up/down.

See commit a6717c01ddc2 ("powerpc/rtas: use device model APIs and
serialization during LPM") for an example description of what might go
wrong.

This also prepares to make cpu_up/down a private interface for anything
but the cpu subsystem.

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
CC: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---

Juergen, there's a new add_cpu() which you should be CCed on. I wasn't sure if
I could safely convert this to use it since I couldn't find whether the
notifier already hold the lock or not. If you think remove_cpu() is safe, let
me know and I can send an updated patch.

 drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c b/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
index f192b6f42da9..ec975decb5de 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int setup_cpu_watcher(struct notifier_block *notifier,
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		if (vcpu_online(cpu) == 0) {
-			(void)cpu_down(cpu);
+			device_offline(get_cpu_device(cpu));
 			set_cpu_present(cpu, false);
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-23 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200223192942.18420-1-qais.yousef@arm.com>
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] cpu: Add new {add,remove}_cpu() functions Qais Yousef
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] smp: Create a new function to shutdown nonboot cpus Qais Yousef
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] ia64: Replace cpu_down with smp_shutdown_nonboot_cpus() Qais Yousef
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] arm: Don't use disable_nonboot_cpus() Qais Yousef
2020-03-20 11:04   ` Qais Yousef
2020-03-20 13:07     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-03-20 13:41       ` Qais Yousef
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] arm64: " Qais Yousef
2020-03-17 11:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-20 14:07     ` Qais Yousef
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] arm64: hibernate.c: Create a new function to handle cpu_up(sleep_cpu) Qais Yousef
2020-03-17 11:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] x86: Replace cpu_up/down with add/remove_cpu Qais Yousef
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] powerpc: " Qais Yousef
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] sparc: " Qais Yousef
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] parisc: " Qais Yousef
2020-02-23 19:29 ` Qais Yousef [this message]
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] firmware: psci: " Qais Yousef
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] torture: " Qais Yousef
2020-02-24  2:53   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] smp: Create a new function to bringup nonboot cpus online Qais Yousef
2020-02-23 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] cpu: Hide cpu_up/down Qais Yousef

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200223192942.18420-12-qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --to=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).