From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com,
cristian.marussi@arm.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 13/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Base notifications support
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:41:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200224144124.2008-14-cristian.marussi@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224144124.2008-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Make SCMI Base protocol register with the notification core.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
---
V2 --> V3
- added handle awareness
V1 --> V2
- simplified .set_notify_enabled() implementation moving the ALL_SRCIDs
logic out of protocol. ALL_SRCIDs logic is now in charge of the
notification core, together with proper reference counting of enables
- switched to devres protocol-registration
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 8 +++
2 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
index ce7d9203e41b..0d4bbf313a4a 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
@@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
*/
#include "common.h"
+#include "notify.h"
+
+#define SCMI_BASE_NUM_SOURCES 1
enum scmi_base_protocol_cmd {
BASE_DISCOVER_VENDOR = 0x3,
@@ -29,6 +32,19 @@ struct scmi_msg_resp_base_attributes {
__le16 reserved;
};
+struct scmi_msg_base_error_notify {
+ __le32 event_control;
+#define BASE_TP_NOTIFY_ALL BIT(0)
+};
+
+struct scmi_base_error_notify_payld {
+ __le32 agent_id;
+ __le32 error_status;
+#define IS_FATAL_ERROR(x) ((x) & BIT(31))
+#define ERROR_CMD_COUNT(x) FIELD_GET(GENMASK(9, 0), (x))
+ __le64 msg_reports[8192];
+};
+
/**
* scmi_base_attributes_get() - gets the implementation details
* that are associated with the base protocol.
@@ -222,6 +238,93 @@ static int scmi_base_discover_agent_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
return ret;
}
+static int scmi_base_error_notify(const struct scmi_handle *handle, bool enable)
+{
+ int ret;
+ u32 evt_cntl = enable ? BASE_TP_NOTIFY_ALL : 0;
+ struct scmi_xfer *t;
+ struct scmi_msg_base_error_notify *cfg;
+
+ ret = scmi_xfer_get_init(handle, BASE_NOTIFY_ERRORS,
+ SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE, sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ cfg = t->tx.buf;
+ cfg->event_control = cpu_to_le32(evt_cntl);
+
+ ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
+
+ scmi_xfer_put(handle, t);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static bool scmi_base_set_notify_enabled(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
+ u8 evt_id, u32 src_id, bool enable)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = scmi_base_error_notify(handle, enable);
+ if (ret)
+ pr_warn("SCMI Notifications - Proto:%X - FAIL_ENABLED - evt[%X] ret:%d\n",
+ SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE, evt_id, ret);
+
+ return !ret ? true : false;
+}
+
+static void *scmi_base_fill_custom_report(u8 evt_id, u64 timestamp,
+ const void *payld, size_t payld_sz,
+ void *report, u32 *src_id)
+{
+ void *rep = NULL;
+
+ switch (evt_id) {
+ case BASE_ERROR_EVENT:
+ {
+ int i;
+ const struct scmi_base_error_notify_payld *p = payld;
+ struct scmi_base_error_report *r = report;
+
+ /*
+ * BaseError notification payload is variable in size but
+ * up to a maximum length determined by the struct ponted by p.
+ * Instead payld_sz is the effective length of this notification
+ * payload so cannot be greater of the maximum allowed size as
+ * pointed by p.
+ */
+ if (sizeof(*p) < payld_sz)
+ break;
+
+ r->timestamp = timestamp;
+ r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
+ r->fatal = IS_FATAL_ERROR(le32_to_cpu(p->error_status));
+ r->cmd_count = ERROR_CMD_COUNT(le32_to_cpu(p->error_status));
+ for (i = 0; i < r->cmd_count; i++)
+ r->reports[i] = le64_to_cpu(p->msg_reports[i]);
+ *src_id = 0;
+ rep = r;
+ break;
+ }
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return rep;
+}
+
+static const struct scmi_event base_events[] = {
+ {
+ .evt_id = BASE_ERROR_EVENT,
+ .max_payld_sz = 8192,
+ .max_report_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_base_error_report),
+ },
+};
+
+static const struct scmi_protocol_event_ops base_event_ops = {
+ .set_notify_enabled = scmi_base_set_notify_enabled,
+ .fill_custom_report = scmi_base_fill_custom_report,
+};
+
int scmi_base_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *h)
{
int id, ret;
@@ -256,6 +359,12 @@ int scmi_base_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *h)
dev_dbg(dev, "Found %d protocol(s) %d agent(s)\n", rev->num_protocols,
rev->num_agents);
+ scmi_register_protocol_events(handle,
+ SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE, (4 * PAGE_SIZE),
+ &base_event_ops, base_events,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(base_events),
+ SCMI_BASE_NUM_SOURCES);
+
for (id = 0; id < rev->num_agents; id++) {
scmi_base_discover_agent_get(handle, id, name);
dev_dbg(dev, "Agent %d: %s\n", id, name);
diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
index 91c5fdf567d5..3a1bc8014f51 100644
--- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
+++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
@@ -420,4 +420,12 @@ struct scmi_reset_issued_report {
u32 reset_state;
};
+struct scmi_base_error_report {
+ ktime_t timestamp;
+ u32 agent_id;
+ bool fatal;
+ u16 cmd_count;
+ u64 reports[8192];
+};
+
#endif /* _LINUX_SCMI_PROTOCOL_H */
--
2.17.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-24 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 14:41 [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] SCMI Notifications Core Support Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive buffer support for notifications Cristian Marussi
2020-03-02 14:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-03-02 15:47 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Update protocol commands and notification list Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notifications support in transport layer Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for notifications message processing Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification protocol-registration Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification callbacks-registration Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification dispatch and delivery Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Enable notification core Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Power notifications support Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Perf " Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Sensor " Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Reset " Cristian Marussi
2020-02-24 14:41 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200224144124.2008-14-cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).