From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22140C11D2F for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0048C20836 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727854AbgBXRQ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:16:26 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:47482 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727090AbgBXRQ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:16:26 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC40BAC44; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:16:18 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Arvind Sankar Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor , x86 , LKML Subject: Re: [tip: x86/boot] x86/boot/compressed: Remove .eh_frame section from bzImage Message-ID: <20200224171618.GA29636@zn.tnic> References: <20200109150218.16544-2-nivedita@alum.mit.edu> <158254422067.28353.10866888120950973607.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <20200224164129.GA312716@rani.riverdale.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200224164129.GA312716@rani.riverdale.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:41:29AM -0500, Arvind Sankar wrote: > Hi Boris, apologies for the confusion and unnecessary work I've created, > but I think the preference is to merge the 2-patch series I posted > yesterday [1] instead of this. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200223193715.83729-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu/ What guarantees this would work and we won't hit some corner case or toolchain configuration this hasn't been tested on? If that happens, I need to have a state to revert back to, i.e., this patch, discarding .eh_frame explicitly. So I'll pick up [1] too, but give people a couple of days - a chance to complain about. :) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg