From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27F0C3F2D3 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF16246A8 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:26:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582896401; bh=z5dwAWLcjLjo0C71mnZQrP9hXaDFY2g2woModyNi4c0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=mfSpEhBYtCwoAch0lJUi9HGer1lGRwIx1I4kw/ItvVykmrnufMyXYHCNdZcYBDTNb uxw0OG6spiWlmGea+gCHSf5ZOt5ECrHRvqS0JJGV85Qp7J+yvap0hAG71Hfl1y//XG gq2MDpOFW9dhJOUqtmcgzZvitY1H5PNYwqGxsnVY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726752AbgB1N0k (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:26:40 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41514 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725876AbgB1N0k (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:26:40 -0500 Received: from devnote2 (NE2965lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [210.141.244.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 997F22469D; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:26:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582896399; bh=z5dwAWLcjLjo0C71mnZQrP9hXaDFY2g2woModyNi4c0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vXQT6sCm/cOR/vLkA3/epVyaK+gc/odiPnJpy8D+WWU8SCl7cMjkWBs3XHpc3upNc xCz21kzRVtCdp88oK3Khn5r3hMziR4mkrq07D9UCd2vjGk3XstZs+hdaBPLSRlxNzf aFOUTw3b2bd9xE27AfNdVu5bxA/4+C71h+M4MU2A= Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:26:35 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu To: Markus Elfring Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Steven Rostedt , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: bootconfig: Update boot configuration documentation Message-Id: <20200228222635.96b258bedd2e68141b8a45c9@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <57b79bdd-36f1-c8c3-e1d3-7d21db47a8f3@web.de> References: <158287861133.18632.12035327305997207220.stgit@devnote2> <158287862131.18632.11822701514141299400.stgit@devnote2> <57b79bdd-36f1-c8c3-e1d3-7d21db47a8f3@web.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:00:43 +0100 Markus Elfring wrote: > … > > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst > … > > +… All sub-keys under "kernel" root key are passed as a part of > > +kernel command line [1]_, and ones under "init" root key are passed as a part > > +of init command line. … > > Can an enumeration be clearer for this information? > > Will the distinction become more interesting for well-known keys? Your question becomes more meaningless... If you have any such concern, you can write a patch on it for a contribution. Yes, you can! Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu