From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA11C3F2D1 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 21:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCC2246B4 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 21:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727718AbgCAVy4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2020 16:54:56 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:41642 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726204AbgCAVwp (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2020 16:52:45 -0500 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j8WVw-003fOE-Ku; Sun, 01 Mar 2020 21:52:44 +0000 From: Al Viro To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: [RFC][PATCH v3 26/55] namei: invert the meaning of WALK_FOLLOW Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 21:52:11 +0000 Message-Id: <20200301215240.873899-26-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200301215240.873899-1-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20200301215125.GA873525@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200301215240.873899-1-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Al Viro old flags & WALK_FOLLOW <=> new !(flags & WALK_TRAILING) That's what that flag had really been used for. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/namei.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c index 56d4adbf4da1..f994ed10ef39 100644 --- a/fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/namei.c @@ -1819,7 +1819,7 @@ static const char *pick_link(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *link, return NULL; } -enum {WALK_FOLLOW = 1, WALK_MORE = 2, WALK_NOFOLLOW = 4}; +enum {WALK_TRAILING = 1, WALK_MORE = 2, WALK_NOFOLLOW = 4}; /* * Do we need to follow links? We _really_ want to be able @@ -1838,8 +1838,8 @@ static const char *step_into(struct nameidata *nd, int flags, if (!(flags & WALK_MORE) && nd->depth) put_link(nd); if (likely(!d_is_symlink(path.dentry)) || - !(flags & WALK_FOLLOW || nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW) || - flags & WALK_NOFOLLOW) { + ((flags & WALK_TRAILING) && !(nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW)) || + (flags & WALK_NOFOLLOW)) { /* not a symlink or should not follow */ path_to_nameidata(&path, nd); nd->inode = inode; @@ -2190,10 +2190,10 @@ static int link_path_walk(const char *name, struct nameidata *nd) if (!name) return 0; /* last component of nested symlink */ - link = walk_component(nd, WALK_FOLLOW); + link = walk_component(nd, 0); } else { /* not the last component */ - link = walk_component(nd, WALK_FOLLOW | WALK_MORE); + link = walk_component(nd, WALK_MORE); } if (unlikely(link)) { if (IS_ERR(link)) @@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ static inline const char *lookup_last(struct nameidata *nd) nd->flags |= LOOKUP_FOLLOW | LOOKUP_DIRECTORY; nd->flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT; - link = walk_component(nd, 0); + link = walk_component(nd, WALK_TRAILING); if (link) { nd->flags |= LOOKUP_PARENT; nd->stack[0].name = NULL; @@ -3274,7 +3274,7 @@ static const char *do_last(struct nameidata *nd, } finish_lookup: - link = step_into(nd, 0, dentry, inode, seq); + link = step_into(nd, WALK_TRAILING, dentry, inode, seq); if (unlikely(link)) { nd->flags |= LOOKUP_PARENT; nd->flags &= ~(LOOKUP_OPEN|LOOKUP_CREATE|LOOKUP_EXCL); -- 2.11.0