From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>, Silvio Cesare <silvio.cesare@gmail.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] slub: Improve bit diffusion for freelist ptr obfuscation Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:24:28 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <202003051623.AF4F8CB@keescook> (raw) Under CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED=y, the obfuscation was relatively weak in that the ptr and ptr address were usually so close that the first XOR would result in an almost entirely 0-byte value[1], leaving most of the "secret" number ultimately being stored after the third XOR. A single blind memory content exposure of the freelist was generally sufficient to learn the secret. Add a swab() call to mix bits a little more. This is a cheap way (1 cycle) to make attacks need more than a single exposure to learn the secret (or to know _where_ the exposure is in memory). kmalloc-32 freelist walk, before: ptr ptr_addr stored value secret ffff90c22e019020@ffff90c22e019000 is 86528eb656b3b5bd (86528eb656b3b59d) ffff90c22e019040@ffff90c22e019020 is 86528eb656b3b5fd (86528eb656b3b59d) ffff90c22e019060@ffff90c22e019040 is 86528eb656b3b5bd (86528eb656b3b59d) ffff90c22e019080@ffff90c22e019060 is 86528eb656b3b57d (86528eb656b3b59d) ffff90c22e0190a0@ffff90c22e019080 is 86528eb656b3b5bd (86528eb656b3b59d) ... after: ptr ptr_addr stored value secret ffff9eed6e019020@ffff9eed6e019000 is 793d1135d52cda42 (86528eb656b3b59d) ffff9eed6e019040@ffff9eed6e019020 is 593d1135d52cda22 (86528eb656b3b59d) ffff9eed6e019060@ffff9eed6e019040 is 393d1135d52cda02 (86528eb656b3b59d) ffff9eed6e019080@ffff9eed6e019060 is 193d1135d52cdae2 (86528eb656b3b59d) ffff9eed6e0190a0@ffff9eed6e019080 is f93d1135d52cdac2 (86528eb656b3b59d) [1] https://blog.infosectcbr.com.au/2020/03/weaknesses-in-linux-kernel-heap.html Reported-by: Silvio Cesare <silvio.cesare@gmail.com> Fixes: 2482ddec670f ("mm: add SLUB free list pointer obfuscation") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> --- mm/slub.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c index 17dc00e33115..107d9d89cf96 100644 --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static inline void *freelist_ptr(const struct kmem_cache *s, void *ptr, * freepointer to be restored incorrectly. */ return (void *)((unsigned long)ptr ^ s->random ^ - (unsigned long)kasan_reset_tag((void *)ptr_addr)); + swab((unsigned long)kasan_reset_tag((void *)ptr_addr))); #else return ptr; #endif -- 2.20.1 -- Kees Cook
reply other threads:[~2020-03-06 0:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=202003051623.AF4F8CB@keescook \ --to=keescook@chromium.org \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=cl@linux.com \ --cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \ --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=penberg@kernel.org \ --cc=rientjes@google.com \ --cc=silvio.cesare@gmail.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] slub: Improve bit diffusion for freelist ptr obfuscation' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).