linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, vkuznets@redhat.com,
	wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org,
	pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, like.xu@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Add support to reprogram PEBS event for guest counters
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 00:28:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202003070038.amFy5Etu%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1583431025-19802-6-git-send-email-luwei.kang@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5518 bytes --]

Hi Luwei,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core tip/auto-latest v5.6-rc4 next-20200306]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Luwei-Kang/PEBS-virtualization-enabling-via-DS/20200306-013049
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git linux-next
config: x86_64-randconfig-h003-20200305 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.5.0-5) 7.5.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   ld: arch/x86/kvm/pmu.o: in function `pmc_reprogram_counter':
>> arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c:199: undefined reference to `perf_x86_pmu_unset_auto_reload'

vim +199 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c

   101	
   102	static void pmc_reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u32 type,
   103					  unsigned config, bool exclude_user,
   104					  bool exclude_kernel, bool intr,
   105					  bool in_tx, bool in_tx_cp)
   106	{
   107		struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(pmc->vcpu);
   108		struct perf_event *event;
   109		struct perf_event_attr attr = {
   110			.type = type,
   111			.size = sizeof(attr),
   112			.pinned = true,
   113			.exclude_idle = true,
   114			.exclude_host = 1,
   115			.exclude_user = exclude_user,
   116			.exclude_kernel = exclude_kernel,
   117			.config = config,
   118			.disabled = 1,
   119		};
   120		bool pebs = test_bit(pmc->idx, (unsigned long *)&pmu->pebs_enable);
   121	
   122		attr.sample_period = (-pmc->counter) & pmc_bitmask(pmc);
   123	
   124		if (in_tx)
   125			attr.config |= HSW_IN_TX;
   126		if (in_tx_cp) {
   127			/*
   128			 * HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED is not supported with nonzero
   129			 * period. Just clear the sample period so at least
   130			 * allocating the counter doesn't fail.
   131			 */
   132			attr.sample_period = 0;
   133			attr.config |= HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED;
   134		}
   135	
   136		if (pebs) {
   137			/*
   138			 * Host never knows the precision level set by guest.
   139			 * Force Host's PEBS event to precision level 1, which will
   140			 * not impact the accuracy of the results for guest PEBS events.
   141			 * Because,
   142			 * - For most cases, there is no difference among precision
   143			 *   level 1 to 3 for PEBS events.
   144			 * - The functions as below checks the precision level in host.
   145			 *   But the results from these functions in host are replaced
   146			 *   by guest when sampling the guest.
   147			 *   The accuracy for guest PEBS events will not be impacted.
   148			 *    -- event_constraints() impacts the index of counter.
   149			 *	The index for host event is exactly the same as guest.
   150			 *	It's decided by guest.
   151			 *    -- pebs_update_adaptive_cfg() impacts the value of
   152			 *	MSR_PEBS_DATA_CFG. When guest is switched in,
   153			 *	the MSR value will be replaced by the value from guest.
   154			 *    -- setup_sample () impacts the output of a PEBS record.
   155			 *	Guest handles the PEBS records.
   156			 */
   157			attr.precise_ip = 1;
   158			/*
   159			 * When the host's PMI handler completes, it's going to
   160			 * enter the guest and trigger the guest's PMI handler.
   161			 *
   162			 * At this moment, this function may be called by
   163			 * kvm_pmu_handle_event(). However the next sample_period
   164			 * hasn't been determined by guest yet and the left period,
   165			 * which probably be 0, is used for current sample_period.
   166			 *
   167			 * In this case, perf will mistakenly treat it as non
   168			 * sampling events. The PEBS event will error out.
   169			 *
   170			 * Fill it with maximum period to prevent the error out.
   171			 * The guest PMI handler will soon reprogram the counter.
   172			 */
   173			if (!attr.sample_period)
   174				attr.sample_period = (-1ULL) & pmc_bitmask(pmc);
   175		}
   176	
   177		event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, -1, current,
   178							 (intr || pebs) ?
   179							 kvm_perf_overflow_intr :
   180							 kvm_perf_overflow, pmc);
   181		if (IS_ERR(event)) {
   182			pr_debug_ratelimited("kvm_pmu: event creation failed %ld for pmc->idx = %d\n",
   183				    PTR_ERR(event), pmc->idx);
   184			return;
   185		}
   186	
   187		if (pebs) {
   188			event->guest_dedicated_idx = pmc->idx;
   189			/*
   190			 * For guest PEBS events, guest takes the responsibility to
   191			 * drain PEBS buffers, and load proper values to reset counters.
   192			 *
   193			 * Host will unconditionally set auto-reload flag for PEBS
   194			 * events with fixed period which is not necessary. Host should
   195			 * do nothing in drain_pebs() but inject the PMI into the guest.
   196			 *
   197			 * Unset the auto-reload flag for guest PEBS events.
   198			 */
 > 199			perf_x86_pmu_unset_auto_reload(event);
   200		}
   201		pmc->perf_event = event;
   202		pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->event_count++;
   203		perf_event_enable(event);
   204		clear_bit(pmc->idx, pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->reprogram_pmi);
   205	}
   206	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 31478 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-06 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-05 17:56 [PATCH v1 00/11] PEBS virtualization enabling via DS Luwei Kang
2020-03-05 16:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-05 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] perf/x86/core: Support KVM to assign a dedicated counter for guest PEBS Luwei Kang
2020-03-06 13:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-06 14:42     ` Liang, Kan
2020-03-09 10:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-09 13:12         ` Liang, Kan
2020-03-09 15:05           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-09 19:28             ` Liang, Kan
2020-03-12 10:28               ` Kang, Luwei
2020-03-26 14:03               ` Liang, Kan
2020-04-07 12:34                 ` Kang, Luwei
2020-06-12  5:28             ` Kang, Luwei
2020-06-19  9:30               ` Kang, Luwei
2020-08-20  3:32               ` Like Xu
2020-03-09 15:44         ` Andi Kleen
2020-03-05 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] perf/x86/ds: Handle guest PEBS events overflow and inject fake PMI Luwei Kang
2020-03-05 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] perf/x86: Expose a function to disable auto-reload Luwei Kang
2020-03-05 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Decouple event enablement from event creation Luwei Kang
2020-03-05 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Add support to reprogram PEBS event for guest counters Luwei Kang
2020-03-06 16:28   ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2020-03-09  0:58     ` Xu, Like
2020-03-05 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Implement is_pebs_via_ds_supported pmu ops Luwei Kang
2020-03-05 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Expose CPUIDs feature bits PDCM, DS, DTES64 Luwei Kang
2020-03-05 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] KVM: x86/pmu: PEBS MSRs emulation Luwei Kang
2020-03-05 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Expose PEBS feature to guest Luwei Kang
2020-03-05 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce the mask value for fixed counter Luwei Kang
2020-03-05 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Adaptive PEBS virtualization enabling Luwei Kang
2020-03-05 22:48 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] PEBS virtualization enabling via DS Andi Kleen
2020-03-06  5:37   ` Kang, Luwei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202003070038.amFy5Etu%lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luwei.kang@intel.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).