From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E72C10DCE for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B83205F4 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="Zv00U6h9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727705AbgCLOtV (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:49:21 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:37140 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727072AbgCLOtU (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:49:20 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0DBF0041CBC9F757D3F2F8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0d:bf00:41cb:c9f7:57d3:f2f8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 615171EC0CB8; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:49:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1584024558; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=mBHoZL5njnwvI/eO0xcZnPNgJOJeyF1z9HV0KTmorIA=; b=Zv00U6h9WsbrsPqWRyn1OwR5ShWoAnRfcGRtafOow3qt5JhRm99BRvNVVkAxu2p9BuoBmo 4ZcAlrp5t+o2H84NsH1HzCnFG6faYBXKpY5AOeA1yv78m1dw+qsH+jRnJjqk/6qVRmEhNy wpr5K0A/TGVjHakyu1TGbK9vw1yI2Xo= Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:49:22 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Hans de Goede Cc: Arvind Sankar , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/purgatory: Make sure we fail the build if purgatory.ro has missing symbols Message-ID: <20200312144922.GG15619@zn.tnic> References: <20200311214601.18141-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20200311214601.18141-3-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20200312001006.GA170175@rani.riverdale.lan> <3d58e77d-41e5-7927-fe84-4c058015e469@redhat.com> <20200312114225.GB15619@zn.tnic> <899f366e-385d-bafa-9051-4e93dc9ba321@redhat.com> <20200312125032.GC15619@zn.tnic> <8af51d90-27fa-6d2a-2159-ef0a9089453a@redhat.com> <20200312142553.GF15619@zn.tnic> <94c6f903-7dca-503e-aca7-1ee4641bcdac@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <94c6f903-7dca-503e-aca7-1ee4641bcdac@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 03:38:22PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > So I've send out 2 versions, not 5 not 10, but only 2 versions in > the past 2 days and you start complaining about me rushing this and > not fixing it properly, to me that does not come across positive. Maybe there's a misunderstanding: when you send a patchset which is not marked RFC, I read this, as, this patchset is ready for application. But then the 0day bot catches build errors which means, not ready yet. And I believe you expected for the 0day bot to test the patches first and they should then to be considered for application. Yes, no? That's why I suggested you to do randconfig builds yourself and not depend on the 0day bot as it is known to be unreliable. So I didn't do anything to make you feel negative - definitely not intentionally. > More specifically my intentions / motives on this were well intended > and I too believe in fixing things the proper way. Your reply suggested > that I just want to rush this through, which calls my motives into > question, for which in my mind there was no reason. > > If you complain about 2 versions in 2 days, or 5 versions over 5 months > then that feels exaggerated and it certainly does not give me a feeling > that the effort which I'm putting into this is being appreciated. I believe I already explained what my problem with that is. If you don't see it, then let's agree to disagree. > Anyways we have a plan how to move forward with this now, so lets > focus on that. Yes, let's do that. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette