linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kmod: make request_module() return an error when autoloading is disabled
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:57:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200313005710.GQ11244@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200312202552.241885-2-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 01:25:49PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> 
> It's long been possible to disable kernel module autoloading completely
> (while still allowing manual module insertion) by setting
> /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe to the empty string.  This can be preferable
> to setting it to a nonexistent file since it avoids the overhead of an
> attempted execve(), avoids potential deadlocks, and avoids the call to
> security_kernel_module_request() and thus on SELinux-based systems
> eliminates the need to write SELinux rules to dontaudit module_request.
> 
> However, when module autoloading is disabled in this way,
> request_module() returns 0.  This is broken because callers expect 0 to
> mean that the module was successfully loaded.
> 
> Apparently this was never noticed because this method of disabling
> module autoloading isn't used much, and also most callers don't use the
> return value of request_module() since it's always necessary to check
> whether the module registered its functionality or not anyway.  But
> improperly returning 0 can indeed confuse a few callers, for example
> get_fs_type() in fs/filesystems.c where it causes a WARNING to be hit:
> 
> 	if (!fs && (request_module("fs-%.*s", len, name) == 0)) {
> 		fs = __get_fs_type(name, len);
> 		WARN_ONCE(!fs, "request_module fs-%.*s succeeded, but still no fs?\n", len, name);
> 	}
> 
> This is easily reproduced with:
> 
> 	echo > /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe
> 	mount -t NONEXISTENT none /
> 
> It causes:
> 
> 	request_module fs-NONEXISTENT succeeded, but still no fs?
> 	WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1106 at fs/filesystems.c:275 get_fs_type+0xd6/0xf0
> 	[...]
> 
> This should actually use pr_warn_once() rather than WARN_ONCE(), since
> it's also user-reachable if userspace immediately unloads the module.
> Regardless, request_module() should correctly return an error when it
> fails.  So let's make it return -ENOENT, which matches the error when
> the modprobe binary doesn't exist.
> 
> I've also sent patches to document and test this case.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>
> Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-13  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-12 20:25 [PATCH v2 0/4] module autoloading fixes and cleanups Eric Biggers
2020-03-12 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] kmod: make request_module() return an error when autoloading is disabled Eric Biggers
2020-03-13  0:57   ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2020-03-12 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] fs/filesystems.c: downgrade user-reachable WARN_ONCE() to pr_warn_once() Eric Biggers
2020-03-12 22:06   ` NeilBrown
2020-03-13  1:00     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-03-13  0:58   ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-03-12 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] docs: admin-guide: document the kernel.modprobe sysctl Eric Biggers
2020-03-12 22:04   ` NeilBrown
2020-03-13  1:07     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-03-13 19:05       ` Eric Biggers
2020-03-13 23:31         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-03-12 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: kmod: test disabling module autoloading Eric Biggers
2020-03-13  1:09   ` Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200313005710.GQ11244@42.do-not-panic.com \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jeffv@google.com \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).