> And we could introduce a new macro called AT24_CHIP_DATA_MASKED that
> would automacially set the AT24_FLAG_MASKED_RANGE flag and take
> another argument that would contain the address and size of the masked
> register range (we'd put it into the "masked" resource)?

I am all for generic solutions. One thing to consider here is that we
need a generic way to detect the various types. I guess it will
always(?) be decided on some memory locations having specific values?