From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EA2C4332E for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734DC2075E for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:33:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1584632038; bh=jd+G1ZXXV6Rkt+GeOtGC574lN8RiNuBcxcec4Go/w9Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=xM57w0aaRuFaEc29hP3NwoJAVtpIerZ6KFIEd9QfjCIto4aat8j/GgaPf+fROMBej 5frtcPVDqJ81JoZSm4MYyWecnykofDBHpc5BVP6YPNGCS0so3+W5OEu27wSBpTpNmT 5qP+bcBo5CE31tJOhepvYqhHiqBQJBQhYvlg/Ns0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727780AbgCSPd5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:33:57 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50070 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727023AbgCSPd5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:33:57 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 452032071C; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:33:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1584632036; bh=jd+G1ZXXV6Rkt+GeOtGC574lN8RiNuBcxcec4Go/w9Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RYBhvYmU0QMgqTdV3Y5Uze1eZpOjJ4fx0clF9xAlLu2XJH8gT4s9DSb7EJ7RWJ1WB DVjZSmcvVbl/Kpp7n3wR8SDL3OWWZ2gi0QJzj1yalGvvKQjMU4YATVzlHXVSOIe4Tr PASt4nDgbvk4f1tACPVNsn4VnjRLskPnJ2DnsS5Q= Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:33:54 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hao Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.5 00/65] 5.5.11-rc1 review Message-ID: <20200319153354.GA133412@kroah.com> References: <20200319123926.466988514@linuxfoundation.org> <20200319145900.GC92193@kroah.com> <32c627bf-0e6b-8bc4-88d3-032a69484aa6@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32c627bf-0e6b-8bc4-88d3-032a69484aa6@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 08:15:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 3/19/20 7:59 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 07:44:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> On 3/19/20 6:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.5.11 release. > >>> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >>> let me know. > >>> > >>> Responses should be made by Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:37:04 +0000. > >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. > >>> > >> > >> arm:davinci_all_defconfig fails to build. > >> > >> include/linux/gpio/driver.h: In function 'gpiochip_populate_parent_fwspec_twocell': > >> include/linux/gpio/driver.h:552:1: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type] > >> 552 | } > >> > >> The problem is caused by commit 8db6a5905e98 ("gpiolib: Add support for the > >> irqdomain which doesn't use irq_fwspec as arg") which is missing its fix, > >> commit 9c6722d85e922 ("gpio: Fix the no return statement warning"). That one > >> is missing a Fixes: tag, providing a good example why such tags are desirable. > > > > Thanks for letting me know, I've now dropped that patch (others > > complained about it for other reasons) and will push out a -rc2 with > > that fix. > > > > I did wonder why the offending patch was included, but then I figured that > I lost the "we apply too many patches to stable releases" battle, and I didn't > want to re-litigate it. It wasn't that, it was a pre-requisite for patch #2. patch #2 was reworked so we could drop this one. thanks, greg k-h