linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@gmail.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/12 v2] ring-buffer: Do not die if rb_iter_peek() fails more than thrice
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 19:22:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200319232732.526602365@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200319232219.446480829@goodmis.org

From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

As the iterator will be reading a live buffer, and if the event being read
is on a page that a writer crosses, it will fail and try again, the
condition in rb_iter_peek() that only allows a retry to happen three times
is no longer valid. Allow rb_iter_peek() to retry more than three times
without killing the ring buffer, but only if rb_iter_head_event() had failed
at least once.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200317213416.452888193@goodmis.org

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 3d718add73c1..475338fda969 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -4012,6 +4012,7 @@ rb_iter_peek(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter, u64 *ts)
 	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
 	struct ring_buffer_event *event;
 	int nr_loops = 0;
+	bool failed = false;
 
 	if (ts)
 		*ts = 0;
@@ -4038,10 +4039,14 @@ rb_iter_peek(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter, u64 *ts)
 	 * to a data event, we should never loop more than three times.
 	 * Once for going to next page, once on time extend, and
 	 * finally once to get the event.
-	 * (We never hit the following condition more than thrice).
+	 * We should never hit the following condition more than thrice,
+	 * unless the buffer is very small, and there's a writer
+	 * that is causing the reader to fail getting an event.
 	 */
-	if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, ++nr_loops > 3))
+	if (++nr_loops > 3) {
+		RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, !failed);
 		return NULL;
+	}
 
 	if (rb_per_cpu_empty(cpu_buffer))
 		return NULL;
@@ -4052,8 +4057,10 @@ rb_iter_peek(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter, u64 *ts)
 	}
 
 	event = rb_iter_head_event(iter);
-	if (!event)
+	if (!event) {
+		failed = true;
 		goto again;
+	}
 
 	switch (event->type_len) {
 	case RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING:
-- 
2.25.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-19 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-19 23:22 [PATCH 00/12 v2] ring-buffer/tracing: Remove disabling of ring buffer while reading trace file Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 01/12 v2] selftest/ftrace: Fix function trigger test to handle trace not disabling the tracer Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 02/12 v2] tracing: Save off entry when peeking at next entry Steven Rostedt
2020-03-20  2:57   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-03-26  9:12   ` [tracing] cd8f62b481: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/slab.h kernel test robot
2020-04-01 14:07     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-01 14:21       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-01 15:04         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-02  7:19           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-02 18:14             ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-03  6:47               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-04-03 13:16                 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 03/12 v2] ring-buffer: Have ring_buffer_empty() not depend on tracing stopped Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 04/12 v2] ring-buffer: Rename ring_buffer_read() to read_buffer_iter_advance() Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 05/12 v2] ring-buffer: Add page_stamp to iterator for synchronization Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 06/12 v2] ring-buffer: Have rb_iter_head_event() handle concurrent writer Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 08/12 v2] ring-buffer: Optimize rb_iter_head_event() Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 09/12 v2] ring-buffer: Do not disable recording when there is an iterator Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 10/12 v2] tracing: Do not disable tracing when reading the trace file Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 11/12 v2] ring-buffer/tracing: Have iterator acknowledge dropped events Steven Rostedt
2020-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 12/12 v2] tracing: Have the document reflect that the trace file keeps tracing enabled Steven Rostedt
2020-03-21 19:13 ` [PATCH 00/12 v2] ring-buffer/tracing: Remove disabling of ring buffer while reading trace file David Laight
2020-03-22 18:07   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-27  1:46   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-27 10:07     ` David Laight
2020-03-27 14:30       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-27 14:56         ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200319232732.526602365@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@lekensteyn.nl \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shuahkhan@gmail.com \
    --cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).