From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf test x86: address multiplexing in rdpmc test
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:18:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200322101848.GF2452@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200321173710.127770-1-irogers@google.com>
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:37:10AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> +static u64 mmap_read_self(void *addr, u64 *running)
> {
> struct perf_event_mmap_page *pc = addr;
> u32 seq, idx, time_mult = 0, time_shift = 0;
> - u64 count, cyc = 0, time_offset = 0, enabled, running, delta;
> + u64 count, cyc = 0, time_offset = 0, enabled, delta;
>
> do {
> seq = pc->lock;
> barrier();
>
> enabled = pc->time_enabled;
> - running = pc->time_running;
> -
> - if (enabled != running) {
> + *running = pc->time_running;
> +
> + if (*running == 0) {
> + /*
> + * Counter won't have a value as due to multiplexing the
> + * event wasn't scheduled.
> + */
> + return 0;
> + }
I still think adding code for an error case here is a bad idea. And only
passing running as an argument is inconsistent.
Also, then I had a look at what the compiler made of that function and
cried.
Here's something a little better. Much of it copied from linux/math64.h
and asm/div64.h.
---
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c
index 1ea916656a2d..386a6dacb21e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c
@@ -34,20 +34,98 @@ static u64 rdtsc(void)
return low | ((u64)high) << 32;
}
-static u64 mmap_read_self(void *addr)
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+static inline u64 mul_u64_u64_div64(u64 a, u64 b, u64 c)
+{
+ u64 q;
+
+ asm ("mulq %2; divq %3" : "=a" (q)
+ : "a" (a), "rm" (b), "rm" (c)
+ : "rdx");
+
+ return q;
+}
+#define mul_u64_u64_div64 mul_u64_u64_div64
+#endif
+
+#ifdef __SIZEOF_INT128__
+
+static inline u64 mul_u64_u32_shr(u64 a, u32 b, unsigned int shift)
+{
+ return (u64)(((unsigned __int128)a * b) >> shift);
+}
+
+#ifndef mul_u64_u64_div64
+static inline u64 mul_u64_u64_div64(u64 a, u64 b, u64 c)
+{
+ unsigned __int128 m = a;
+ m *= b;
+ return m / c;
+}
+#endif
+
+#else
+
+#ifdef __i386__
+static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b)
+{
+ u32 high, low;
+
+ asm ("mull %[b]" : "=a" (low), "=d" (high)
+ : [a] "a" (a), [b] "rm" (b) );
+
+ return low | ((u64)high) << 32;
+}
+#else
+static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b)
+{
+ return (u64)a * b;
+}
+#endif
+
+static inline u64 mul_u64_u32_shr(u64 a, u32 b, unsigned int shift)
+{
+ u32 ah, al;
+ u64 ret;
+
+ al = a;
+ ah = a >> 32;
+
+ ret = mul_u32_u32(al, mul) >> shift;
+ if (ah)
+ ret += mul_u32_u32(ah, mul) << (32 - shift);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+#ifndef mul_u64_u64_div64
+static inline u64 mul_u64_u64_div64(u64 a, u64 b, u64 c)
+{
+ u64 quot, rem;
+
+ quot = a / c;
+ rem = a % c;
+
+ return qout * b + (rem * b) / c;
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif
+
+static u64 mmap_read_self(void *addr, u64 *enabled, u64 *running)
{
struct perf_event_mmap_page *pc = addr;
u32 seq, idx, time_mult = 0, time_shift = 0;
- u64 count, cyc = 0, time_offset = 0, enabled, running, delta;
+ u64 count, cyc = 0, time_offset = 0;
do {
seq = pc->lock;
barrier();
- enabled = pc->time_enabled;
- running = pc->time_running;
+ *enabled = pc->time_enabled;
+ *running = pc->time_running;
- if (enabled != running) {
+ if (*enabled != *running) {
cyc = rdtsc();
time_mult = pc->time_mult;
time_shift = pc->time_shift;
@@ -62,21 +140,13 @@ static u64 mmap_read_self(void *addr)
barrier();
} while (pc->lock != seq);
- if (enabled != running) {
- u64 quot, rem;
-
- quot = (cyc >> time_shift);
- rem = cyc & (((u64)1 << time_shift) - 1);
- delta = time_offset + quot * time_mult +
- ((rem * time_mult) >> time_shift);
-
- enabled += delta;
+ if (*enabled != *running) {
+ u64 delta = time_offset + mul_u64_u32_shr(cyc, time_mult, time_shift);
+ *enabled += delta;
if (idx)
- running += delta;
+ *running += delta;
- quot = count / running;
- rem = count % running;
- count = quot * enabled + (rem * enabled) / running;
+ count = mul_u64_u64_div64(count, *enabled, *running);
}
return count;
@@ -130,14 +200,18 @@ static int __test__rdpmc(void)
}
for (n = 0; n < 6; n++) {
- u64 stamp, now, delta;
+ u64 stamp, now, delta, enabled, running;
- stamp = mmap_read_self(addr);
+ stamp = mmap_read_self(addr, &enabled, &running);
for (i = 0; i < loops; i++)
tmp++;
- now = mmap_read_self(addr);
+ now = mmap_read_self(addr, &enabled, &running);
+
+ if (enabled && !running)
+ goto out_error;
+
loops *= 10;
delta = now - stamp;
@@ -155,6 +229,11 @@ static int __test__rdpmc(void)
return -1;
return 0;
+
+out_error:
+ close(fd);
+ pr_err("counter never ran; you loose\n");
+ return -1;
}
int test__rdpmc(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-22 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-21 17:37 [PATCH v2] perf test x86: address multiplexing in rdpmc test Ian Rogers
2020-03-22 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-03-22 23:18 ` Andi Kleen
2020-03-23 12:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-23 0:14 ` Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200322101848.GF2452@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).