From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29385C43331 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D27206E6 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="l2x1GyZl" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728610AbgCZTq5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:46:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com ([209.85.210.68]:41565 "EHLO mail-ot1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726067AbgCZTq5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:46:57 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id f52so7242070otf.8 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:46:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ee5qM+UNNhRdG2dNaTXRGtyqNayzs63lsgczoaNreJM=; b=l2x1GyZlkZF9oRBxhEU7te49PRoz0eu4EF/59XoktRp1nrCsRNCzbM0Lva5uP/k77G WC9rZMflq0KZduqjqjq8SA6Mt6IlMZCkQ7x/RLm8/SXvM+++pRcN3Z8b5Jfd2yMFBSZB hx5TR9NcgLkGAhd5lFVbs0VQXt3EMVCvBprSoQsTrT5nYFJg3KbnrHAqEJIb4CAwbRaH Z9dcW1Hoz5uDcasHff5qgPkevFZ1Ldc51DjaJujadj7i2bcC8vXn6gt7Scty5aSlV0KK B7xTGDMTR3orlQzoqFpdkPJBaUQgU0augBFtBOdY4TxW9bn7FqCrFw5NcZYgJcgAB/bt rBcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ee5qM+UNNhRdG2dNaTXRGtyqNayzs63lsgczoaNreJM=; b=XDdcyP+jjR8gQfvK07XhoJ1lgv5ZS9OXXa42cU/+GaUd1xAwWho5Vb49S8AiqeFKUs EuLHzm8EeKg6DcWzQLywi/AlxeUfxuvM8sSq4RJPhDE2WR092T4Deq6k1Ol44MPmJbBa xDJi3NKDvX+vhSMX+0xReGLe2OZynuX1M1MnZ+VX1eiLx8/RNLqtEx8VXok8J4mPEKDg 770STDRJ3LUCKqdIdnmcd9bTsycjYx+o9UwC387zkC92ULfvwEA1HDzUvRrd0QJjU9AW AdOoTIGQtnX6Np3o3/rU3NcD79QbKkkbNRbmkvdQgMP0+cILNbVWO5b8gyenTfMEaNh3 Jx5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3uxXVl58q+MZ+q6auOv34wZZ8/N01TlU1b5DmfHD6xBhM6vuZL OVrNZyRkr33I2InZ8OWVvqI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs9CQcJYrRkELNE3uM4uTdtIU5AZVMSFKAJxnIb14jVUA+B3vZrMjy5wJFaJ5I63TbKsq4eFQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1610:: with SMTP id g16mr7415044otr.358.1585252016634; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ubuntu-m2-xlarge-x86 ([2604:1380:4111:8b00::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z14sm867885oia.23.2020.03.26.12.46.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:46:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:46:52 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Nick Desaulniers Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: Use address-of operator on section symbols Message-ID: <20200326194652.GA29213@ubuntu-m2-xlarge-x86> References: <20200220051011.26113-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> <20200319020004.GB8292@ubuntu-m2-xlarge-x86> <20200319103312.070b4246@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200319103312.070b4246@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:33:12AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:00:04 -0700 > Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > Gentle ping for review/acceptance. > > Hmm, my local patchwork had this patch rejected. I'll go and apply it, run > some tests and see if it works. Perhaps I meant to reject v1 and > accidentally rejected v2 :-/ > > Thanks for the ping! > > -- Steve Hi Steve, Did you ever get around to running any tests? If so, were there any issues? This warning is one of two remaining across several different configurations so I sent the patch to turn on the warning and I want to make sure this gets picked up at some point: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200326194155.29107-1-natechancellor@gmail.com/ If you have not had time, totally fine, I just want to make sure it does not fall through the cracks again :) Thank you, Nathan