From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
peter@bikeshed.quignogs.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] Compactly make code examples into literal blocks
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:50:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200327165022.GP22483@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327104126.667b5d5b@lwn.net>
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:41:26AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:28:54 +0200
> Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > IMHO the real problem is kernel-doc doing too much preprocessing on the
> > input, preventing us from doing what would be the sensible thing in
> > rst. The more we try to fix the problem by adding more kernel-doc
> > processing, the further we dig ourselves into this hole.
> >
> > If kernel-doc didn't have its own notion of section headers, such as
> > "example:", we wouldn't have this problem to begin with. We could just
> > use the usual rst construct; "example::" followed by an indented block.
> >
> > I'm not going to stand in the way of the patch, but I'm telling you,
> > this is going to get harder, not easier, on this path.
>
> I agree with you in principle. The problem, of course, is that this is a
> legacy gift from before the RST days and it will be hard to change.
>
> A quick grep shows that the pattern:
>
> * Example:
>
> appears nearly 100 times in current kernels. It is not inconceivable to
> make a push to get rid of all of those, turning them into ordinary RST
> syntax - especially since not all of those are actually kerneldoc
> comments.
>
> The same quick grep says that "returns?:" appears about 10,000 times.
> *That* will be painful to change, and I can only imagine that some
> resistance would have to be overcome at some point.
>
> So what do folks think we should do? :)
Let me just check I understand Jani's proposal here. You want to change
* Return: Number of pages, or negative errno on failure
to
* Return
* ~~~~~~
* Number of pages, or negative errno on failure
If so, I oppose such an increase in verbosity and I think most others
would too. If not, please let me know what you're actually proposing ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-27 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-11 19:22 [PATCH 0/1] Format kerneldoc code snippets as literal block peter
2020-03-11 19:22 ` [PATCH 1/1] Added double colons and blank lines within kerneldoc to format code snippets as ReST literal blocks peter
2020-03-11 19:30 ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-03-26 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] Compactly make code examples into " peter
2020-03-26 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] A compact idiom to add code examples in kerneldoc comments peter
2020-03-26 19:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-03-26 19:36 ` Peter Lister
2020-03-26 19:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] Compactly make code examples into literal blocks peter
2020-03-26 19:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] A compact idiom to add code examples in kerneldoc comments peter
2020-03-26 19:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-03-27 6:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-27 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] Compactly make code examples into literal blocks Jani Nikula
2020-03-27 16:41 ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-03-27 16:50 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-03-27 17:11 ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-03-27 17:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-03-31 11:22 ` Jani Nikula
2020-03-31 10:50 ` Jani Nikula
2020-03-30 22:29 ` Peter Lister
2020-03-30 22:32 ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-03-31 11:54 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200327165022.GP22483@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@bikeshed.quignogs.org.uk \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).