linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	luto@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 09:34:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200328163412.GJ8104@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200325030924.132881-3-xiaoyao.li@intel.com>

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:09:24AM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> In a context switch from a task that is detecting split locks
> to one that is not (or vice versa) we need to update the TEST_CTRL
> MSR. Currently this is done with the common sequence:
> 	read the MSR
> 	flip the bit
> 	write the MSR
> in order to avoid changing the value of any reserved bits in the MSR.
> 
> Cache unused and reserved bits of TEST_CTRL MSR with SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT
> bit cleared during initialization, so we can avoid an expensive RDMSR
> instruction during context switch.
> 
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Originally-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> index deb5c42c2089..1f414578899c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ enum split_lock_detect_state {
>   * split lock detect, unless there is a command line override.
>   */
>  static enum split_lock_detect_state sld_state __ro_after_init = sld_off;
> +static u64 msr_test_ctrl_cache __ro_after_init;

What about using "msr_test_ctrl_base_value", or something along those lines?
"cache" doesn't make it clear that SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT is guaranteed to be
zero in this variable.

>  
>  /*
>   * Processors which have self-snooping capability can handle conflicting
> @@ -1037,6 +1038,8 @@ static void __init split_lock_setup(void)
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> +	rdmsrl(MSR_TEST_CTRL, msr_test_ctrl_cache);

If we're going to bother skipping the RDMSR if state=sld_off on the command
line then it also makes sense to skip it if enabling fails, i.e. move this
below split_lock_verify_msr(true).

> +
>  	if (!split_lock_verify_msr(true)) {
>  		pr_info("MSR access failed: Disabled\n");
>  		return;
> @@ -1053,14 +1056,10 @@ static void __init split_lock_setup(void)
>   */
>  static void sld_update_msr(bool on)
>  {
> -	u64 test_ctrl_val;
> -
> -	rdmsrl(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val);
> +	u64 test_ctrl_val = msr_test_ctrl_cache;
>  
>  	if (on)
>  		test_ctrl_val |= MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
> -	else
> -		test_ctrl_val &= ~MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
>  
>  	wrmsrl(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-28 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-25  3:09 [PATCH v7 0/2] Fix and optimization of split_lock_detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25  3:09 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-28 16:32   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-30 13:26     ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-30 14:26       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-25  3:09 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-28 16:34   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-03-29  9:13     ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-30 18:18       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-03 17:44 ` [PATCH 0/1] x86/split_lock: check split lock feature on initialization Benjamin Lamowski
2020-04-03 17:44   ` [PATCH 1/1] " Benjamin Lamowski
2020-04-03 18:01     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-06  8:23       ` Benjamin Lamowski
2020-04-06 11:48         ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-04-06 15:57           ` [PATCH v2 0/1] x86/split_lock: check split lock support " Benjamin Lamowski
2020-04-06 16:02             ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Benjamin Lamowski
2020-04-06 16:17               ` [PATCH v3 " Benjamin Lamowski
2020-04-06 21:24                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-06 21:21   ` [PATCH 0/1] x86/split_lock: check split lock feature " Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200328163412.GJ8104@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).