From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5ABC43331 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93D3206F5 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:19:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585934385; bh=KwoVdbxuLurcwZ6tzVcPQ1p256AfOix1p2+b/yvaElI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=X9jxQR0F3WjwyJT+jAfYdtFION3t2qnAusInhS1JlCL6WZL/SZ0K/rI0ROEOavp7p 0/CoPUST2nKw3aw7B6uGnXqmbMlPjIgukS+v5LVGgnTltr7iMCGxkGz6n0biIo/SVh tm+TINV/0Z2tguHSRLZGC6tWpKmUuFUz+jBaXYrw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404270AbgDCRTo (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 13:19:44 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51724 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727998AbgDCRTo (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 13:19:44 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.1.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B7952080C; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:19:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585934383; bh=KwoVdbxuLurcwZ6tzVcPQ1p256AfOix1p2+b/yvaElI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Z7sUKFm/atbB3d0guNhEPm8JNRYUrzkM1COSbvzZ7X//eJFJ62EwzBG0Rr6wL4iTi xYknAG7LxPixigyxtyM4gOOdvTe/XI13qnUD4p/9TRCpHlT7AzdLZYXQ980eUVtiMN wFJ5mnnx95sY6IuGPDXbC0cq38yOGAPj4Jy6Zskw= Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:19:43 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Sahitya Tummala Cc: Chao Yu , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix long latency due to discard during umount Message-ID: <20200403171943.GC68460@google.com> References: <1585550730-1858-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org> <20200331184655.GB198665@google.com> <20200401092201.GB20234@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200401092201.GB20234@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/01, Sahitya Tummala wrote: > Hi Jaegeuk, > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:46:55AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 03/30, Sahitya Tummala wrote: > > > F2FS already has a default timeout of 5 secs for discards that > > > can be issued during umount, but it can take more than the 5 sec > > > timeout if the underlying UFS device queue is already full and there > > > are no more available free tags to be used. In that case, submit_bio() > > > will wait for the already queued discard requests to complete to get > > > a free tag, which can potentially take way more than 5 sec. > > > > > > Fix this by submitting the discard requests with REQ_NOWAIT > > > flags during umount. This will return -EAGAIN for UFS queue/tag full > > > scenario without waiting in the context of submit_bio(). The FS can > > > then handle these requests by retrying again within the stipulated > > > discard timeout period to avoid long latencies. > > > > Sorry, Sahitya, but, do we really need to do like this? How about just > > controlling # of outstanding discarding bios in __issue_discard_cmd()? > > Do you mean something like this? > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > index 1a62b27..860dd43 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > @@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ static void __init_discard_policy(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > } else if (discard_type == DPOLICY_FSTRIM) { > dpolicy->io_aware = false; > } else if (discard_type == DPOLICY_UMOUNT) { > - dpolicy->max_requests = UINT_MAX; > + dpolicy->max_requests = 30; Can we use max queue depth of the block device? > dpolicy->io_aware = false; > /* we need to issue all to keep CP_TRIMMED_FLAG */ > dpolicy->granularity = 1; > @@ -1470,12 +1470,14 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > struct list_head *pend_list; > struct discard_cmd *dc, *tmp; > struct blk_plug plug; > - int i, issued = 0; > + int i, issued; > bool io_interrupted = false; > > if (dpolicy->timeout != 0) > f2fs_update_time(sbi, dpolicy->timeout); > > +retry: > + issued = 0; > for (i = MAX_PLIST_NUM - 1; i >= 0; i--) { > if (dpolicy->timeout != 0 && > f2fs_time_over(sbi, dpolicy->timeout)) > @@ -1522,6 +1524,11 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > break; > } > > + if (dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_UMOUNT && issued) { > + __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy); > + goto retry; > + } > + > if (!issued && io_interrupted) > issued = -1; > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala > > > --- > > > v3: > > > -Handle the regression reported by Chao with v2. > > > -simplify the logic to split the dc with multiple bios incase any bio returns > > > EAGAIN and retry those new dc within 5 sec timeout. > > > > > > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > > > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > > index fb3e531..55d18c7 100644 > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > > @@ -1029,13 +1029,16 @@ static void f2fs_submit_discard_endio(struct bio *bio) > > > struct discard_cmd *dc = (struct discard_cmd *)bio->bi_private; > > > unsigned long flags; > > > > > > - dc->error = blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status); > > > - > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&dc->lock, flags); > > > + if (!dc->error) > > > + dc->error = blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status); > > > + > > > dc->bio_ref--; > > > - if (!dc->bio_ref && dc->state == D_SUBMIT) { > > > - dc->state = D_DONE; > > > - complete_all(&dc->wait); > > > + if (!dc->bio_ref) { > > > + if (dc->error || dc->state == D_SUBMIT) { > > > + dc->state = D_DONE; > > > + complete_all(&dc->wait); > > > + } > > > } > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dc->lock, flags); > > > bio_put(bio); > > > @@ -1124,10 +1127,13 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > > struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info; > > > struct list_head *wait_list = (dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_FSTRIM) ? > > > &(dcc->fstrim_list) : &(dcc->wait_list); > > > - int flag = dpolicy->sync ? REQ_SYNC : 0; > > > + int flag; > > > block_t lstart, start, len, total_len; > > > int err = 0; > > > > > > + flag = dpolicy->sync ? REQ_SYNC : 0; > > > + flag |= dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_UMOUNT ? REQ_NOWAIT : 0; > > > + > > > if (dc->state != D_PREP) > > > return 0; > > > > > > @@ -1192,10 +1198,6 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > > dc->bio_ref++; > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dc->lock, flags); > > > > > > - atomic_inc(&dcc->queued_discard); > > > - dc->queued++; > > > - list_move_tail(&dc->list, wait_list); > > > - > > > /* sanity check on discard range */ > > > __check_sit_bitmap(sbi, lstart, lstart + len); > > > > > > @@ -1203,6 +1205,29 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > > bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_submit_discard_endio; > > > bio->bi_opf |= flag; > > > submit_bio(bio); > > > + if (flag & REQ_NOWAIT) { > > > + if (dc->error == -EAGAIN) { > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dc->lock, flags); > > > + dc->len -= len; > > > + if (!dc->len) { > > > + dc->len = total_len; > > > + dc->state = D_PREP; > > > + reinit_completion(&dc->wait); > > > + } else { > > > + dcc->undiscard_blks -= total_len; > > > + if (dc->state == D_PARTIAL) > > > + dc->state = D_SUBMIT; > > > + } > > > + err = dc->error; > > > + dc->error = 0; > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dc->lock, flags); > > > + break; > > > + } > > > + } > > > + > > > + atomic_inc(&dcc->queued_discard); > > > + dc->queued++; > > > + list_move_tail(&dc->list, wait_list); > > > > > > atomic_inc(&dcc->issued_discard); > > > > > > @@ -1214,8 +1239,9 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > > len = total_len; > > > } > > > > > > - if (!err && len) > > > - __update_discard_tree_range(sbi, bdev, lstart, start, len); > > > + if ((!err || err == -EAGAIN) && total_len && dc->start != start) > > > + __update_discard_tree_range(sbi, bdev, lstart, start, > > > + total_len); > > > return err; > > > } > > > > > > @@ -1470,12 +1496,15 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > > struct list_head *pend_list; > > > struct discard_cmd *dc, *tmp; > > > struct blk_plug plug; > > > - int i, issued = 0; > > > + int i, err, issued = 0; > > > bool io_interrupted = false; > > > + bool retry; > > > > > > if (dpolicy->timeout != 0) > > > f2fs_update_time(sbi, dpolicy->timeout); > > > > > > +retry: > > > + retry = false; > > > for (i = MAX_PLIST_NUM - 1; i >= 0; i--) { > > > if (dpolicy->timeout != 0 && > > > f2fs_time_over(sbi, dpolicy->timeout)) > > > @@ -1509,7 +1538,12 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > > break; > > > } > > > > > > - __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued); > > > + err = __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued); > > > + if (err == -EAGAIN) { > > > + congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, > > > + DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT); > > > + retry = true; > > > + } > > > > > > if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests) > > > break; > > > @@ -1522,6 +1556,9 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > > break; > > > } > > > > > > + if (retry) > > > + goto retry; > > > + > > > if (!issued && io_interrupted) > > > issued = -1; > > > > > > -- > > > Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > > > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. > > -- > -- > Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.