From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D09C2BB55 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B822076D for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:02:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586955767; bh=9comZy+VKV018j2KhxsEbXwamZKAXU7+CY3v7/ohlVE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=c/vyLUOQg2og2rv5YdjrzLJPGblRLIwvqHLSMSZO3CWOAI68RXD7zx6X5zHmzzbZH DpxEMyxyWvC4tJiVbn+S1xR5mwERh1QzflGsH9s03dcJX4/C7v5/rsGfMULWjm23FY SUvn2G3Sxi/hIqh26ikvH9+a5wj6zCUlgoiJrbCc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2897200AbgDONCn (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:02:43 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56292 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2897151AbgDOLge (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:36:34 -0400 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42EAF2137B; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:36:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586950590; bh=9comZy+VKV018j2KhxsEbXwamZKAXU7+CY3v7/ohlVE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=0MKbMs/pxMpt7jsydgq8mr46M8rE/+MRYA/DksFcBA3+QS+5+LbXT+oHNT7ExIDWR nu/GPPRmKkyNKSY2ikmZd9wXzu+Ypsu4OWjU95J8lxXK88WJxojULWe+laoN46bzuN UboM/0fWSG2S2hnm4j0V3lvLMynIN6N7koiYEmL0= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Qian Cai , Borislav Petkov , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Sasha Levin , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 087/129] x86: ACPI: fix CPU hotplug deadlock Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:34:02 -0400 Message-Id: <20200415113445.11881-87-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200415113445.11881-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20200415113445.11881-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Qian Cai [ Upstream commit 696ac2e3bf267f5a2b2ed7d34e64131f2287d0ad ] Similar to commit 0266d81e9bf5 ("acpi/processor: Prevent cpu hotplug deadlock") except this is for acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(): "The problem is that the work is scheduled on the current CPU from the hotplug thread associated with that CPU. It's not required to invoke these functions via the workqueue because the hotplug thread runs on the target CPU already. Check whether current is a per cpu thread pinned on the target CPU and invoke the function directly to avoid the workqueue." WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected ------------------------------------------------------ cpuhp/1/15 is trying to acquire lock: ffffc90003447a28 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x4c6/0x630 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: cpus_read_lock+0x3e/0xc0 irq_calc_affinity_vectors+0x5f/0x91 __pci_enable_msix_range+0x10f/0x9a0 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0x13e/0x1f0 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity at drivers/pci/msi.c:1208 pqi_ctrl_init+0x72f/0x1618 [smartpqi] pqi_pci_probe.cold.63+0x882/0x892 [smartpqi] local_pci_probe+0x7a/0xc0 work_for_cpu_fn+0x2e/0x50 process_one_work+0x57e/0xb90 worker_thread+0x363/0x5b0 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&wfc.work) --> cpuhp_state-up --> cpuidle_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(cpuidle_lock); lock(cpuhp_state-up); lock(cpuidle_lock); lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by cpuhp/1/15: #0: ffffffffaf51ab10 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 #1: ffffffffaf51ad40 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 #2: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa0/0xea print_circular_bug.cold.52+0x147/0x14c check_noncircular+0x295/0x2d0 __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Signed-off-by: Qian Cai Tested-by: Borislav Petkov [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 3 ++- drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c | 7 ------- include/acpi/processor.h | 8 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c index caf2edccbad2e..49ae4e1ac9cd8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c @@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ int acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(unsigned int cpu, /* Make sure we are running on right CPU */ - retval = work_on_cpu(cpu, acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe_cpu, cx); + retval = call_on_cpu(cpu, acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe_cpu, cx, + false); if (retval == 0) { /* Use the hint in CST */ percpu_entry->states[cx->index].eax = cx->address; diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c index 532a1ae3595a7..a0bd56ece3ff5 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c @@ -897,13 +897,6 @@ static long __acpi_processor_get_throttling(void *data) return pr->throttling.acpi_processor_get_throttling(pr); } -static int call_on_cpu(int cpu, long (*fn)(void *), void *arg, bool direct) -{ - if (direct || (is_percpu_thread() && cpu == smp_processor_id())) - return fn(arg); - return work_on_cpu(cpu, fn, arg); -} - static int acpi_processor_get_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr) { if (!pr) diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h index 47805172e73d8..683e124ad517d 100644 --- a/include/acpi/processor.h +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h @@ -297,6 +297,14 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter(struct acpi_processor_cx } #endif +static inline int call_on_cpu(int cpu, long (*fn)(void *), void *arg, + bool direct) +{ + if (direct || (is_percpu_thread() && cpu == smp_processor_id())) + return fn(arg); + return work_on_cpu(cpu, fn, arg); +} + /* in processor_perflib.c */ #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ -- 2.20.1