From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: linux-rt@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] signal: Prevent double-free of user struct
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:46:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200415164628.2dgrj4ghvtev45sy@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200407095413.30039-1-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
On 2020-04-07 10:54:13 [+0100], Matt Fleming wrote:
> The way user struct reference counting works changed significantly with,
>
> fda31c50292a ("signal: avoid double atomic counter increments for user accounting")
>
> Now user structs are only freed once the last pending signal is
> dequeued. Make sigqueue_free_current() follow this new convention to
> avoid freeing the user struct multiple times and triggering this
> warning:
>
> refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6794 at lib/refcount.c:288 refcount_dec_not_one+0x45/0x50
> Call Trace:
> refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave+0x16/0x60
> free_uid+0x31/0xa0
> ? schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x104/0x110
> __dequeue_signal+0x17c/0x190
> dequeue_signal+0x5a/0x1b0
> do_sigtimedwait+0x208/0x250
> __x64_sys_rt_sigtimedwait+0x6f/0xd0
> do_syscall_64+0x72/0x200
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
While all this sounds reasonable, may I ask what did you do to trigger
this?
This is v5.6 only, correct?
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-15 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-07 9:54 [PATCH RT] signal: Prevent double-free of user struct Matt Fleming
2020-04-15 16:46 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2020-04-15 19:05 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-04-16 8:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-04-07 14:45 Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200415164628.2dgrj4ghvtev45sy@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).