linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] arm64: cpufeature: Add CPU capability for AArch32 EL1 support
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:00:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200415170029.GA19615@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b76993491176577567a0960a435dac0@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 09:55:57AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-04-14 22:31, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Although we emit a "SANITY CHECK" warning and taint the kernel if we
> > detect a CPU mismatch for AArch32 support at EL1, we still online the
> > CPU with disastrous consequences for any running 32-bit VMs.
> > 
> > Introduce a capability for AArch32 support at EL1 so that late onlining
> > of incompatible CPUs is forbidden.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> 
> Definitely an improvement over the current situation, as the direct read
> of ID_AA64PFR0 was always a bit dodgy. Given that I'm pretty sure these new
> braindead SoCs are going to run an older version of the kernel, should we
> Cc stable for this?

I don't think there's a real need for -stable given that we do at least
taint the kernel. That's likely to annoy vendors enough to backport this
themselves ;)

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-15 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-14 21:31 [PATCH 0/8] Relax sanity checking for mismatched AArch32 EL1 Will Deacon
2020-04-14 21:31 ` [PATCH 1/8] arm64: cpufeature: Relax check for IESB support Will Deacon
2020-04-15 10:02   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-14 21:31 ` [PATCH 2/8] arm64: cpufeature: Spell out register fields for ID_ISAR4 and ID_PFR1 Will Deacon
2020-04-15 10:09   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-14 21:31 ` [PATCH 3/8] arm64: cpufeature: Add CPU capability for AArch32 EL1 support Will Deacon
2020-04-15  8:55   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-15 17:00     ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-04-15 10:13   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-15 10:14     ` Will Deacon
2020-04-15 13:15       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-15 13:22         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-17  9:44           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-14 21:31 ` [PATCH 4/8] arm64: cpufeature: Remove redundant call to id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0() Will Deacon
2020-04-15 10:25   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-14 21:31 ` [PATCH 5/8] arm64: cpufeature: Factor out checking of AArch32 features Will Deacon
2020-04-15 10:36   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-14 21:31 ` [PATCH 6/8] arm64: cpufeature: Relax AArch32 system checks if EL1 is 64-bit only Will Deacon
2020-04-15 10:43   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-14 21:31 ` [PATCH 7/8] arm64: cpufeature: Relax checks for AArch32 support at EL[0-2] Will Deacon
2020-04-15 10:50   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-15 10:58     ` Will Deacon
2020-04-15 11:37       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-15 12:29         ` Will Deacon
2020-04-17  9:37           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-14 21:31 ` [PATCH 8/8] arm64: cpufeature: Add an overview comment for the cpufeature framework Will Deacon
2020-04-16 11:58   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-16 14:59   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-16 15:26     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-16 18:12     ` Will Deacon
2020-04-16  8:39 ` [PATCH 0/8] Relax sanity checking for mismatched AArch32 EL1 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-16 10:26   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200415170029.GA19615@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).