From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
jolsa@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com,
vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com, pavel.gerasimov@intel.com,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/17] Stitch LBR call stack (Perf Tools)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 18:55:56 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200417215556.GE21512@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200417215516.GD21512@kernel.org>
Em Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 06:55:17PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 06:54:02PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 05:47:49PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/17/2020 1:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Em Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 01:25:00PM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com escreveu:
> > > > > For a simple test case tchain_edit with 43 depth of call stacks.
> > > > > perf record --call-graph lbr -- ./tchain_edit
> > > > > perf report --stitch-lbr
> >
> > > > > Without --stitch-lbr, perf report only display 32 depth of call stacks.
> > > > > With --stitch-lbr, perf report can display all 43 depth of call stacks.
> > > > > The depth of call stacks increase 34.3%.
> >
> > > > > Correspondingly, the processing time of perf report increases 39%,
> > > > > Without --stitch-lbr: 11.0 sec
> > > > > With --stitch-lbr: 15.3 sec
> >
> > > > Next time provide the full test proggie, I had to expand those ... to
> > > > reproduce your results,
> >
> > > Sure, I will do so in the future.
> >
> > > > all I have is in perf/core, some patches are
> > > > still to be processed, will continue later, have to stop now, see:
> >
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?id=13cfba6b741ff
> >
> > > > For my testing, looks really great!
> >
> > > Thanks for the testing. :)
> >
> > My pleasure.
> >
> > BTW everything is in there by now.
>
> And I had to do some more fixes to get it building in my container build
> test suite, I've restarted it and now its at this point:
>
> Fri 17 Apr 2020 06:18:18 PM -03
> $ export PERF_TARBALL=http://192.168.122.1/perf/perf-5.7.0-rc1.tar.xz
> $ dm
> 1 125.76 alpine:3.4 : Ok gcc (Alpine 5.3.0) 5.3.0, clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final)
> 2 123.16 alpine:3.5 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.2.1) 6.2.1 20160822, clang version 3.8.1 (tags/RELEASE_381/final)
> 3 127.96 alpine:3.6 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.3.0) 6.3.0, clang version 4.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_400/final)
> 4 138.24 alpine:3.7 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.4.0) 6.4.0, Alpine clang version 5.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_500/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.0)
> 5 147.38 alpine:3.8 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.4.0) 6.4.0, Alpine clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_501/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.1)
> 6 160.57 alpine:3.9 : Ok gcc (Alpine 8.3.0) 8.3.0, Alpine clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_502/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.1)
> 7 186.38 alpine:3.10 : Ok gcc (Alpine 8.3.0) 8.3.0, Alpine clang version 8.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_800/final) (based on LLVM 8.0.0)
> 8 208.66 alpine:3.11 : Ok gcc (Alpine 9.2.0) 9.2.0, Alpine clang version 9.0.0 (https://git.alpinelinux.org/aports f7f0d2c2b8bcd6a5843401a9a702029556492689) (based on LLVM 9.0.0)
> 9 176.99 alpine:edge : Ok gcc (Alpine 9.2.0) 9.2.0, Alpine clang version 9.0.1 (git://git.alpinelinux.org/aports 6c34b9a10bcdcdac04a11569c50b61fb50c4ea6e) (based on LLVM 9.0.1)
> 10 86.14 alt:p8 : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 5.3.1 20151207 (ALT p8 5.3.1-alt3.M80P.1), clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final)
> 11 99.43 alt:p9 : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20190507 (ALT p9 8.3.1-alt5), clang version 7.0.1
> 12 104.78 alt:sisyphus : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.2.1 20200123 (ALT Sisyphus 9.2.1-alt3), clang version 9.0.1
> 13 77.72 amazonlinux:1 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.2.1 20170915 (Red Hat 7.2.1-2), clang version 3.6.2 (tags/RELEASE_362/final)
> 14 120.69 amazonlinux:2 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180712 (Red Hat 7.3.1-6), clang version 7.0.1 (Amazon Linux 2 7.0.1-1.amzn2.0.2)
> 15 24.96 android-ndk:r12b-arm : Ok arm-linux-androideabi-gcc (GCC) 4.9.x 20150123 (prerelease)
> 16 25.73 android-ndk:r15c-arm : Ok arm-linux-androideabi-gcc (GCC) 4.9.x 20150123 (prerelease)
> 17 22.34 centos:5 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-55)
> 18 31.91 centos:6 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23)
> 19 36.18 centos:7 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-39)
> 20 129.17 centos:8 : Ok gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20190507 (Red Hat 8.3.1-4), clang version 8.0.1 (Red Hat 8.0.1-1.module_el8.1.0+215+a01033fb)
> 21: clearlinux:latest
Just as I pressed the send hotkey:
21 45.71 clearlinux:latest : Ok gcc (Clear Linux OS for Intel Architecture) 9.3.1 20200325 releases/gcc-9.3.0-55-gdff885cdc0, clang version 9.0.1
:-)
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-19 20:25 [PATCH V4 00/17] Stitch LBR call stack (Perf Tools) kan.liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 01/17] perf pmu: Add support for PMU capabilities kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 02/17] perf header: Support CPU " kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 03/17] perf record: Clear HEADER_CPU_PMU_CAPS for non LBR call stack mode kan.liang
2020-04-17 14:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 04/17] perf stat: Clear HEADER_CPU_PMU_CAPS kan.liang
2020-04-17 14:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 05/17] perf machine: Remove the indent in resolve_lbr_callchain_sample kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 06/17] perf machine: Refine the function for LBR call stack reconstruction kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 07/17] perf machine: Factor out lbr_callchain_add_kernel_ip() kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 08/17] perf machine: Factor out lbr_callchain_add_lbr_ip() kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 09/17] perf thread: Add a knob for LBR stitch approach kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 10/17] perf tools: Save previous sample for LBR stitching approach kan.liang
2020-04-17 15:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] perf thread: " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 11/17] perf tools: Save previous cursor nodes " kan.liang
2020-04-17 16:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] perf callchain: " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 12/17] perf tools: Stitch LBR call stack kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] perf callchain: " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 13/17] perf report: Add option to enable the LBR stitching approach kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 14/17] perf script: " kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 15/17] perf top: " kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 16/17] perf c2c: " kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-19 20:25 ` [PATCH V4 17/17] perf hist: Add fast path for duplicate entries check kan.liang
2020-04-22 12:17 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-03-23 11:13 ` [PATCH V4 00/17] Stitch LBR call stack (Perf Tools) Jiri Olsa
2020-04-02 15:34 ` Liang, Kan
2020-04-02 16:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-02 17:02 ` Liang, Kan
2020-04-17 17:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-17 21:47 ` Liang, Kan
2020-04-17 21:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-17 21:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-17 21:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200417215556.GE21512@kernel.org \
--to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel.gerasimov@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).