Re: [PATCH] srcu: Fix a typo in comment "amoritized"->"amortized"

Re: [PATCH] srcu: Fix a typo in comment "amoritized"->"amortized"

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 07:46:47PM +0800, Ethon Paul wrote:
> There is a typo in comment, fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ethon Paul <ethp@qq.com>

Good eyes!!!  Queued, thank you!

I did edit the commit log as shown below.  Please let me know if I messed
anything up.

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 496c9c0dc7b259ee93ea91789a20e09421e840c1
Author: Ethon Paul <ethp@qq.com>
Date:   Sat Apr 18 19:46:47 2020 +0800

    srcu: Fix a typo in comment "amoritized"->"amortized"
    
    This commit fixes a typo in a comment.
    
    Signed-off-by: Ethon Paul <ethp@qq.com>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 6d3ef70..8ff71e5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ static void srcu_flip(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
  * it, if this function was preempted for enough time for the counters
  * to wrap, it really doesn't matter whether or not we expedite the grace
  * period.  The extra overhead of a needlessly expedited grace period is
- * negligible when amoritized over that time period, and the extra latency
+ * negligible when amortized over that time period, and the extra latency
  * of a needlessly non-expedited grace period is similarly negligible.
  */
 static bool srcu_might_be_idle(struct srcu_struct *ssp)