linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, yuyufen@huawei.com, tj@kernel.org,
	bvanassche@acm.org, tytso@mit.edu, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] bdi: add a ->dev_name field to struct backing_dev_info
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:58:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420115856.GA12115@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e02b7cdc-f29a-916c-d923-224a1b312485@redhat.com>

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 01:41:57PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> AFAICT for vboxsf the bdi-name can be anything as long as it is unique, hence
> the "vboxsf-" prefix to make this unique vs other block-devices and the
> ".%d" postfix is necessary because the same export can be mounted multiple
> times (without using bind mounts), see:
> https://github.com/jwrdegoede/vboxsf/issues/3

Shouldn't vboxsf switch to get_tree_single instead of get_tree_nodev?
Having two independent dentry trees for a single actual file system
can be pretty dangerous.

>
> The presence of the source inside the bdi-name is only for informational
> purposes really, so truncating that should be fine, maybe switch to:
>
> "vboxsf%d-%s" as format string and swap the sbi->bdi_id and fc->source
> in the args, then if we truncate anything it will be the source (which
> as said is only there for informational purposes) and the name will
> still be guaranteed to be unique.

Can we just switch to vboxsf%d where %d іs a simple monotonically
incrementing count?  That is what various other file systems (e.g. ceph)
do.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-20 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-16 16:54 bdi: fix use-after-free for dev_name(bdi->dev) v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-16 16:54 ` [PATCH 1/8] bdi: move bdi_dev_name out of line Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-18 15:35   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-16 16:54 ` [PATCH 2/8] bdi: use bdi_dev_name() to get device name Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-18 15:37   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-16 16:54 ` [PATCH 3/8] bdi: add a ->dev_name field to struct backing_dev_info Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-17  8:59   ` Jan Kara
2020-04-17 13:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-20 11:41       ` Hans de Goede
2020-04-20 11:58         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-04-21 12:42           ` Hans de Goede
2020-04-18 15:40     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-19  7:58       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-19 15:29         ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-19 16:06           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-20  7:48             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-20  9:52               ` Jan Kara
2020-04-20  9:49             ` Jan Kara
2020-04-16 16:54 ` [PATCH 4/8] driver core: remove device_create_vargs Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-16 16:54 ` [PATCH 5/8] bdi: unexport bdi_register_va Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-18 15:41   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-16 16:54 ` [PATCH 6/8] bdi: remove bdi_register_owner Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-18 15:43   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-16 16:54 ` [PATCH 7/8] bdi: simplify bdi_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-18 15:44   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-16 16:54 ` [PATCH 8/8] bdi: remove the name field in struct backing_dev_info Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-18 15:45   ` Bart Van Assche
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-16  7:15 bdi: fix use-after-free for dev_name(bdi->dev) Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-16  7:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] bdi: add a ->dev_name field to struct backing_dev_info Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-16  7:52   ` Greg KH
2020-04-16  8:34   ` Yufen Yu
2020-04-16 12:02     ` Jan Kara
2020-04-16 12:19       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-16 12:22         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-16 12:31           ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200420115856.GA12115@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).