From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DE8C5518C for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117E52076E for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:09:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1587550152; bh=GI1A56xH4jtV1mwRDVoGAjyG1Z0mT8Hvjl9lGEaovbM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=TEzZXAv6zXN05dkBchZFVIkdBc/yd7/VE6cq03qjCrw8nhmoRNb2gbSHntTKG6q8X 03E/gvcvm6h2WgYm+/AL5jNhk08aicfnydW/EfmKjq/OmPUZ5/VcnUYwCnDfx/i0lj FeKZXRrf6ATEkzitSG4m/Xt79Oq4K7MzYJobHkWE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728825AbgDVKJK (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 06:09:10 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35316 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728779AbgDVKJE (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 06:09:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6D6E20575; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:09:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1587550143; bh=GI1A56xH4jtV1mwRDVoGAjyG1Z0mT8Hvjl9lGEaovbM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eWhshX/QMjFgPlhoh0vVftVa/edy7GcAIj4h3UKuNG57lrBU13bi2VCDZf+cRUpJ+ ej4tc5y058Ro8VA0C/OCRnsweUkaYOtvCjI6upUWNfAQehA00gY9F6EvKK79ehzrtS qIjknJAVjnI4e4Ita3O3lrJzo3G9LOxxh91WLOE4= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Qu Wenruo , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 027/199] btrfs: remove a BUG_ON() from merge_reloc_roots() Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:55:53 +0200 Message-Id: <20200422095100.822614077@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200422095057.806111593@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200422095057.806111593@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Josef Bacik [ Upstream commit 7b7b74315b24dc064bc1c683659061c3d48f8668 ] This was pretty subtle, we default to reloc roots having 0 root refs, so if we crash in the middle of the relocation they can just be deleted. If we successfully complete the relocation operations we'll set our root refs to 1 in prepare_to_merge() and then go on to merge_reloc_roots(). At prepare_to_merge() time if any of the reloc roots have a 0 reference still, we will remove that reloc root from our reloc root rb tree, and then clean it up later. However this only happens if we successfully start a transaction. If we've aborted previously we will skip this step completely, and only have reloc roots with a reference count of 0, but were never properly removed from the reloc control's rb tree. This isn't a problem per-se, our references are held by the list the reloc roots are on, and by the original root the reloc root belongs to. If we end up in this situation all the reloc roots will be added to the dirty_reloc_list, and then properly dropped at that point. The reloc control will be free'd and the rb tree is no longer used. There were two options when fixing this, one was to remove the BUG_ON(), the other was to make prepare_to_merge() handle the case where we couldn't start a trans handle. IMO this is the cleaner solution. I started with handling the error in prepare_to_merge(), but it turned out super ugly. And in the end this BUG_ON() simply doesn't matter, the cleanup was happening properly, we were just panicing because this BUG_ON() only matters in the success case. So I've opted to just remove it and add a comment where it was. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c index d4c00edd16d2b..42f388ed0796b 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c @@ -2480,7 +2480,21 @@ out: free_reloc_roots(&reloc_roots); } - BUG_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&rc->reloc_root_tree.rb_root)); + /* + * We used to have + * + * BUG_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&rc->reloc_root_tree.rb_root)); + * + * here, but it's wrong. If we fail to start the transaction in + * prepare_to_merge() we will have only 0 ref reloc roots, none of which + * have actually been removed from the reloc_root_tree rb tree. This is + * fine because we're bailing here, and we hold a reference on the root + * for the list that holds it, so these roots will be cleaned up when we + * do the reloc_dirty_list afterwards. Meanwhile the root->reloc_root + * will be cleaned up on unmount. + * + * The remaining nodes will be cleaned up by free_reloc_control. + */ } static void free_block_list(struct rb_root *blocks) -- 2.20.1