linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de,
	paulus@ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
	cohuck@redhat.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, vkuznets@redhat.com,
	wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, maz@kernel.org,
	james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: s390: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:58:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200422125810.34847-2-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422125810.34847-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

In the current kvm version, 'kvm_run' has been included in the 'kvm_vcpu'
structure. Earlier than historical reasons, many kvm-related function
parameters retain the 'kvm_run' and 'kvm_vcpu' parameters at the same time.
This patch does a unified cleanup of these remaining redundant parameters.

Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index e335a7e5ead7..d7bb2e7a07ff 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -4176,8 +4176,9 @@ static int __vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
 	struct runtime_instr_cb *riccb;
 	struct gs_cb *gscb;
 
@@ -4235,7 +4236,7 @@ static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
 		}
 		if (vcpu->arch.gs_enabled) {
 			current->thread.gs_cb = (struct gs_cb *)
-						&vcpu->run->s.regs.gscb;
+						&kvm_run->s.regs.gscb;
 			restore_gs_cb(current->thread.gs_cb);
 		}
 		preempt_enable();
@@ -4243,8 +4244,10 @@ static void sync_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
 	/* SIE will load etoken directly from SDNX and therefore kvm_run */
 }
 
-static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
+
 	if (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_PREFIX)
 		kvm_s390_set_prefix(vcpu, kvm_run->s.regs.prefix);
 	if (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & KVM_SYNC_CRS) {
@@ -4257,23 +4260,23 @@ static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
 		vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc = kvm_run->s.regs.ckc;
 	}
 	save_access_regs(vcpu->arch.host_acrs);
-	restore_access_regs(vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs);
+	restore_access_regs(kvm_run->s.regs.acrs);
 	/* save host (userspace) fprs/vrs */
 	save_fpu_regs();
 	vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fpc = current->thread.fpu.fpc;
 	vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.regs = current->thread.fpu.regs;
 	if (MACHINE_HAS_VX)
-		current->thread.fpu.regs = vcpu->run->s.regs.vrs;
+		current->thread.fpu.regs = kvm_run->s.regs.vrs;
 	else
-		current->thread.fpu.regs = vcpu->run->s.regs.fprs;
-	current->thread.fpu.fpc = vcpu->run->s.regs.fpc;
+		current->thread.fpu.regs = kvm_run->s.regs.fprs;
+	current->thread.fpu.fpc = kvm_run->s.regs.fpc;
 	if (test_fp_ctl(current->thread.fpu.fpc))
 		/* User space provided an invalid FPC, let's clear it */
 		current->thread.fpu.fpc = 0;
 
 	/* Sync fmt2 only data */
 	if (likely(!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))) {
-		sync_regs_fmt2(vcpu, kvm_run);
+		sync_regs_fmt2(vcpu);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * In several places we have to modify our internal view to
@@ -4292,8 +4295,10 @@ static void sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
 	kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
 }
 
-static void store_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+static void store_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
+
 	kvm_run->s.regs.todpr = vcpu->arch.sie_block->todpr;
 	kvm_run->s.regs.pp = vcpu->arch.sie_block->pp;
 	kvm_run->s.regs.gbea = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gbea;
@@ -4313,8 +4318,10 @@ static void store_regs_fmt2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
 	/* SIE will save etoken directly into SDNX and therefore kvm_run */
 }
 
-static void store_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
+static void store_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
+
 	kvm_run->psw_mask = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask;
 	kvm_run->psw_addr = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.addr;
 	kvm_run->s.regs.prefix = kvm_s390_get_prefix(vcpu);
@@ -4324,16 +4331,16 @@ static void store_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
 	kvm_run->s.regs.pft = vcpu->arch.pfault_token;
 	kvm_run->s.regs.pfs = vcpu->arch.pfault_select;
 	kvm_run->s.regs.pfc = vcpu->arch.pfault_compare;
-	save_access_regs(vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs);
+	save_access_regs(kvm_run->s.regs.acrs);
 	restore_access_regs(vcpu->arch.host_acrs);
 	/* Save guest register state */
 	save_fpu_regs();
-	vcpu->run->s.regs.fpc = current->thread.fpu.fpc;
+	kvm_run->s.regs.fpc = current->thread.fpu.fpc;
 	/* Restore will be done lazily at return */
 	current->thread.fpu.fpc = vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fpc;
 	current->thread.fpu.regs = vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.regs;
 	if (likely(!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu)))
-		store_regs_fmt2(vcpu, kvm_run);
+		store_regs_fmt2(vcpu);
 }
 
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -4371,7 +4378,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	sync_regs(vcpu, kvm_run);
+	sync_regs(vcpu);
 	enable_cpu_timer_accounting(vcpu);
 
 	might_fault();
@@ -4393,7 +4400,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	}
 
 	disable_cpu_timer_accounting(vcpu);
-	store_regs(vcpu, kvm_run);
+	store_regs(vcpu);
 
 	kvm_sigset_deactivate(vcpu);
 
-- 
2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-22 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-22 12:58 [PATCH v2 0/7] clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-22 12:58 ` Tianjia Zhang [this message]
2020-04-22 13:45   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: s390: " Cornelia Huck
2020-04-22 15:58     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-22 16:04       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-23  3:01         ` Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-23 10:39           ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-23 10:58             ` Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-23 11:00               ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-23 11:11                 ` Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-26 12:59                 ` Thomas Huth
2020-04-29  2:20                   ` Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-23  3:14       ` Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-23  2:54     ` Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-22 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: arm64: " Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-22 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: PPC: Remove redundant kvm_run from vcpu_arch Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-22 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: PPC: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-22 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: PPC: clean up redundant kvm_run parameters in assembly Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-22 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: MIPS: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters Tianjia Zhang
2020-04-22 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: MIPS: clean up redundant kvm_run parameters in assembly Tianjia Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200422125810.34847-2-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).