From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2079C54FCB for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7187920736 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728542AbgDXRuy (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 13:50:54 -0400 Received: from mailomta10-re.btinternet.com ([213.120.69.103]:12941 "EHLO re-prd-fep-048.btinternet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727091AbgDXRuy (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 13:50:54 -0400 Received: from re-prd-rgout-002.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net ([10.2.54.5]) by re-prd-fep-048.btinternet.com with ESMTP id <20200424175051.NJSI20795.re-prd-fep-048.btinternet.com@re-prd-rgout-002.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net>; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:50:51 +0100 Authentication-Results: btinternet.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) smtp.auth=j.oldman998@btinternet.com X-Originating-IP: [31.51.225.56] X-OWM-Source-IP: 31.51.225.56 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: j.oldman998@btinternet.com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrhedugdduudefucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuueftkffvkffujffvgffngfevqffopdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkffosedttdertdertddtnecuhfhrohhmpeflohhhnhcuqfhlughmrghnuceojhhohhhnrdholhgumhgrnhesphholhgvhhhilhhlrdgtohdruhhkqeenucfkphepfedurdehuddrvddvhedrheeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghlohephhgvnhhrhidrhhhomhgvpdhinhgvthepfedurdehuddrvddvhedrheeipdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoehjohhhnhdrohhlughmrghnsehpohhlvghhihhllhdrtghordhukheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoehjohhhnhdrohhlughmrghnsehpohhlvghhihhllhdrtghordhukheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoehlihhnuhigqdhkvghrnhgvlhesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrgheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoehlihhnuhigqdifihhrvghlvghsshesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrgheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoehmsegsuhgvshdrtghhqe X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from henry.home (31.51.225.56) by re-prd-rgout-002.btmx-prd.synchronoss.net (5.8.340) (authenticated as j.oldman998@btinternet.com) id 5E3A15B60CEBB0BC; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:50:51 +0100 From: John Oldman To: m@bues.ch Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Oldman Subject: [PATCH] :ssb sprom.c: Fixed block comments coding style issues Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:50:43 +0100 Message-Id: <20200424175043.16261-1-john.oldman@polehill.co.uk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fixed coding style issues Signed-off-by: John Oldman --- drivers/ssb/sprom.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ssb/sprom.c b/drivers/ssb/sprom.c index 52d2e0f33be7..42d620cee8a9 100644 --- a/drivers/ssb/sprom.c +++ b/drivers/ssb/sprom.c @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_show(struct ssb_bus *bus, char *buf, /* Use interruptible locking, as the SPROM write might * be holding the lock for several seconds. So allow userspace - * to cancel operation. */ + * to cancel operation. + */ err = -ERESTARTSYS; if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&bus->sprom_mutex)) goto out_kfree; @@ -121,7 +122,8 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_store(struct ssb_bus *bus, /* Use interruptible locking, as the SPROM write might * be holding the lock for several seconds. So allow userspace - * to cancel operation. */ + * to cancel operation. + */ err = -ERESTARTSYS; if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&bus->sprom_mutex)) goto out_kfree; @@ -188,9 +190,11 @@ int ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct ssb_sprom *out) bool ssb_is_sprom_available(struct ssb_bus *bus) { /* status register only exists on chipcomon rev >= 11 and we need check - for >= 31 only */ + * for >= 31 only + */ /* this routine differs from specs as we do not access SPROM directly - on PCMCIA */ + * on PCMCIA + */ if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI && bus->chipco.dev && /* can be unavailable! */ bus->chipco.dev->id.revision >= 31) -- 2.17.1