From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E644EC54FD0 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEED206B6 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726572AbgD0FgT (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 01:36:19 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:45448 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726178AbgD0FgS (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 01:36:18 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id AF26768CEE; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:36:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:36:16 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Al Viro Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Kees Cook , Iurii Zaikin , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v3 Message-ID: <20200427053616.GC15905@lst.de> References: <20200424064338.538313-1-hch@lst.de> <20200426155958.GS23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200426155958.GS23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 04:59:58PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > OK, I can live with that; further work can live on top of that, anyway. > How are we going to handle that? I can put it into never-rebased branch > in vfs.git (#work.sysctl), so that people could pull that. > > FWIW, I'm putting together more uaccess stuff (will probably hit -next > tonight or tomorrow); this would fit well there... Sounds good to me. The first patch isn't really needed for the series and could go in through the bpf tree.