From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CBFC83007 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4F5206B9 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="DmPwSr7x" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726636AbgD1IGI (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 04:06:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726253AbgD1IGH (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 04:06:07 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x244.google.com (mail-lj1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::244]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B47F6C03C1A9; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 01:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x244.google.com with SMTP id a21so20458518ljb.9; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 01:06:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=e/ZfrxrHaYp4ZY3rObwWUQUSJ2Md/wwi7RL79f3Bw7g=; b=DmPwSr7xJlCyMCcEaFZybSuG7ZAcfiJwG34dztFSi3q5fNbsj8VzbwMLnIQ6mmWMAW 5esvm2E5nriVmjw3lwhHrjGYII8gFN9PclS9ZJTllscECVx/+nL1VfL9yLftlXca4vnz hz1ht8NerFYx1CjyLpCsBkstnqGMIZM4VxRmr3ZQbf8GcmFfaUjgMjDS36exqvzZzSM8 6ZN46nbAdhZsR6y7/F0ALFyhLNPLPbQbZCRgt/fFeTUhDZHrTZAPs5p3jwqepaBA8d8p baXAXMtaxcAmPZSerfJF1Voseb5pehgY7bJgt5DNtPlZwhiD0uTAuT0c6ZTS7dMq+6vT HBgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=e/ZfrxrHaYp4ZY3rObwWUQUSJ2Md/wwi7RL79f3Bw7g=; b=BZcKtEYsr/3MViHD4TXZLxZ3hwfWISkL2b96FV8EJ/bdxY/BcfoSnWiuJPBuNM122C JavIczOH9bmpe/uhaLoYuWSx26wQ/iUek7zfl2bWK6+HOPsj3MvP7gIFwT5oW+an9xlb PnldkZgdVZGpwKYpUP9gkMtthqM6GPMtsPPkh8fw5bsf5EH70xmj3LQOGzNMP/5Gmpez KgCJkUBDJajZvmtMc6YUOQyRuysdSU+pczHqgy5GB3E95JUg2pX+YtsCT85qeHIVuiwY NPYJHOvLCwuOIxwhhurQ6sBXQBkALcktf1xolUNCAbOMdE3U9y8yHG+oNqxuVuWqdz+I RAFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYkfmG8UyBBLcr+xUjB0bKOlKNAXJtUI/p21TTwEKX/s7EVJaes 7NKCgDMt9CW9D6lkNis4FkQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI2pEdiPylKtG2Ev1FBU5piF1Pn+Gc4EEL7/7yFhPJGVS68CpPOD8Thq3mqNDJCz5aHdkYNcQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0c5:: with SMTP id g5mr16867541ljl.203.1588061164257; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 01:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from curiosity (ip-195-182-157-78.clients.cmk.ru. [195.182.157.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k18sm16064282lfg.81.2020.04.28.01.06.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 01:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:10:31 +0300 From: Sergey Matyukevich To: Johannes Berg Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Wireless , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mac80211-next tree Message-ID: <20200428081031.GA4287@curiosity> References: <20200428122930.51b6a9c2@canb.auug.org.au> <20200428072543.GA2630@curiosity> <20200428074527.GA3912@curiosity> <40afd04ed8fb49088268e7d3316d3fef9aa8dbd9.camel@sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40afd04ed8fb49088268e7d3316d3fef9aa8dbd9.camel@sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Looks good. But I have a couple of questions: > > > > - why cleanup vif->mgmt_frame_reg in wilc_mac_open ? > > Otherwise wilc_update_mgmt_frame_registrations() will think there are no > changes whatsoever, and do nothing. > > > - previously wilc_wfi_p2p_rx was called only for PROBE_REQ and ACTION, > > now it will be called for all the other registred frames as well > > > Huh, good catch. How about this? > > https://p.sipsolutions.net/51183f5492f05ea6.txt Ok, this one looks good to me. Regards, Sergey