From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE31C83000 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A226206D7 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:01:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588089712; bh=+hCcSrtU4Z9NRNiGVI8Xsd43qyZ27ONKAD8GFB/miMU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=y+ATNk03Ppm8VLltpdbD6i7zzEyd31TXttJBpGEw5PS0WmHcc6Tw+Tqpvd7alHZ0j 9C+BHPXg02H4wXbGRj/wxmmdSIEWTbpPDb1hayRX5XUdIVyWoMjzaiHQlhAOmhK4pW WQ4efGpvmeoixSIkqOrn2JuV1FfXFPOG0LOd8tek= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728363AbgD1QBv (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:01:51 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56300 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728151AbgD1QBu (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:01:50 -0400 Received: from willie-the-truck (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC13F20575; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:01:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588089710; bh=+hCcSrtU4Z9NRNiGVI8Xsd43qyZ27ONKAD8GFB/miMU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ilt3xTEkYMKB4sqTEUeQ5Qt9HWHPAIk9ZUBmkp4cvxACNz+SabFBXiVl5D67vY2Ps MaAXQNKjTVFGpMSTnWuxXiiGB160mdCBU9AkxqppIi9bY9vg6eg/U+dj2uXxLjq66z Hv1w6WxTY0r9q0pcA8koz/oNQuQXrlcFAsnmn/es= Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:01:43 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Alexander Viro , Paul Elliott , Peter Zijlstra , Yu-cheng Yu , Amit Kachhap , Vincenzo Frascino , Marc Zyngier , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Szabolcs Nagy , "H . J . Lu " , Andrew Jones , Kees Cook , Arnd Bergmann , Jann Horn , Richard Henderson , Kristina =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C5=A1enko?= , Thomas Gleixner , Florian Weimer , Sudakshina Das , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/13] arm64: Branch Target Identification support Message-ID: <20200428160141.GD12697@willie-the-truck> References: <20200316165055.31179-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200422154436.GJ4898@sirena.org.uk> <20200422162954.GF3585@gaia> <20200428132804.GF6791@willie-the-truck> <20200428151205.GH5677@sirena.org.uk> <20200428151815.GB12697@willie-the-truck> <20200428155808.GJ5677@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200428155808.GJ5677@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:58:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:18:16PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:12:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > It's probably easier for me if you just use the existing branch, I've > > > already got a branch based on a merge down. > > > Okey doke, I'll funnel that in the direction of linux-next then. It does > > mean that any subsequent patches for 5.8 that depend on BTI will need to > > be based on this branch, so as long as you're ok with that then it's fine > > by me (since I won't be able to apply patches if they refer to changes > > introduced in the recent merge window). > > That's not a problem, that's what I've got already and if I try to send > everything based off -rc3 directly the series would get unmanagably > large. Actually unless you think it's a bad idea I think what I'll do > is go and send out a couple of the preparatory changes (the insn updates > and the last bit of annotation conversions) separately for that branch > while I finalize the revisions of the main BTI kernel bit, hopefully > that'll make the review a bit more approachable. Okey doke, sounds good to me. I'm queuing stuff atm, so as long you tell me what I need to apply things against then we should be good. Will