From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] powerpc/numa: Prefer node id queried from vphn
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:22:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200429065229.GA18304@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200428093836.27190-3-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hello Srikar,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:08:35PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Node id queried from the static device tree may not
> be correct. For example: it may always show 0 on a shared processor.
> Hence prefer the node id queried from vphn and fallback on the device tree
> based node id if vphn query fails.
>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changelog v1:->v2:
> - Rebased to v5.7-rc3
>
> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> index b3615b7fdbdf..281531340230 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> @@ -719,20 +719,20 @@ static int __init parse_numa_properties(void)
> */
> for_each_present_cpu(i) {
> struct device_node *cpu;
> - int nid;
> -
> - cpu = of_get_cpu_node(i, NULL);
> - BUG_ON(!cpu);
> - nid = of_node_to_nid_single(cpu);
> - of_node_put(cpu);
> + int nid = vphn_get_nid(i);
>
> /*
> * Don't fall back to default_nid yet -- we will plug
> * cpus into nodes once the memory scan has discovered
> * the topology.
> */
> - if (nid < 0)
> - continue;
> + if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> + cpu = of_get_cpu_node(i, NULL);
> + if (cpu) {
Why are we not retaining the BUG_ON(!cpu) assert here ?
> + nid = of_node_to_nid_single(cpu);
> + of_node_put(cpu);
> + }
> + }
Is it possible at this point that both vphn_get_nid(i) and
of_node_to_nid_single(cpu) returns NUMA_NO_NODE ? If so,
should we still call node_set_online() below ?
> node_set_online(nid);
> }
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-29 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-28 9:38 [PATCH v2 0/3] Offline memoryless cpuless node 0 Srikar Dronamraju
2020-04-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc/numa: Set numa_node for all possible cpus Srikar Dronamraju
2020-04-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] powerpc/numa: Prefer node id queried from vphn Srikar Dronamraju
2020-04-29 6:52 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2020-04-30 4:34 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-04-28 9:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/page_alloc: Keep memoryless cpuless node 0 offline Srikar Dronamraju
2020-04-28 23:59 ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-29 1:41 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-04-29 12:22 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-30 7:18 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-05-04 9:37 ` Michal Hocko
2020-05-08 13:03 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-05-08 13:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-08 13:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-11 17:47 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-05-12 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-12 10:42 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200429065229.GA18304@in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).