From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD89DC83006 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 03:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5D12073E for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 03:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="mZoGzVoK" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726546AbgD3DGe (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 23:06:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38778 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726180AbgD3DGd (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 23:06:33 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x343.google.com (mail-ot1-x343.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::343]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49469C035494; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x343.google.com with SMTP id e26so3726876otr.2; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:06:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ABv9ETxmWVKZEO3VSo8L3zhU3G/XlY5BsKo9f2kZ5Yk=; b=mZoGzVoKLbQZAxzfUkp0A91eCDYoyBo8tHgMZV9uN7sK3XWYShi7wxaVwXbuCiN5fJ NukUVJE5MHc4z8TFMm3C+6yAunEEJOpVwPE5AkNEfzDK2SkwyegmWVH8V7v/1iIBKvxw qaDY7lJ8DpfUVK254Ura1XH+64gYYj02730nA4RGOQxi4LtXxctSvVj4GNcjhKxdyRPR xFJAs+D/QkQPQDV23ozNTuFsZKJ3T+lyGNSYPym6wTGWh26XUKva4V74yLUeD7cHGidO 0kTWYjRw+2o9mYL8FohVs9oorCj/vwoAN8ZvFIOxEAyKUOIC99qtSF0Pg1w4/HS1Tc6R 4cCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ABv9ETxmWVKZEO3VSo8L3zhU3G/XlY5BsKo9f2kZ5Yk=; b=esFK1IRmrH547eUp+n8QfXuIrh15Yio395gqVqx3xn7FyKcYmFarEULryWJE5zeZRg AJaRzZdaDp3+Rj/3crotM8QSO7KNPeAmEGtNpaOcZKd+REPWvVqSRgI5Go/2pSWc3v3y w24SNyhYV88aqvGUswhCWSMw8pTT3FUnc3wZloaDEps/yP/n5/pqXqi7NRHVumwQ18wO QP6vyjCl8H3QZR2BrFOjjdjShhgicpAbQqqi+Yj/RstqXrlviPDJlljPChVSD+Ib92s5 n458tuFJjssUJ7i+hZRoMQrkKis9WdpumNyJmubL9Y6ymdEea/QoA+Tv2MlnD+i2/bmv LGew== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubXntyjEBuJZyOmv2OUBlx/xsSUAwpMWNUjbm7Cyc9YyaZvLC6Q O5rn4baarwhJPnLmG9+HYm4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJdF1+JvYVFI/vROWk4KVS2q/2HHbebeqzLzbQt3+P5rUWAys5TcAJJKZ41KrVgBNtXSVSrtw== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2622:: with SMTP id a31mr926767otb.231.1588215992718; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ubuntu-s3-xlarge-x86 ([2604:1380:4111:8b00::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 94sm878669otc.72.2020.04.29.20.06.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 20:06:30 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Sedat Dilek Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer , Masahiro Yamada , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Clang-Built-Linux ML , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers , Fangrui Song , Sami Tolvanen , Dmitry Golovin Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Allow ld.lld to link the MIPS VDSO Message-ID: <20200430030630.GB3546299@ubuntu-s3-xlarge-x86> References: <20200423171807.29713-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> <20200428221419.2530697-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:14 AM Nathan Chancellor > wrote: > > > Patch 1 adds ld.lld support to Kconfig so that we can avoid certain > > ld.bfd checks. > > > > Is it possible to introduce and add LD_IS_BFD Kconfig for ld.bfd in this series? > Most people agreed on this name AFAICS. > What do people think? > > - Sedat - What is the use case for LD_IS_BFD right now? I am not sure I see a reason to add a CONFIG value that won't see any immediate use. Cheers, Nathan