From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D9EC47254 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 11:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B56206B9 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 11:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728953AbgEELQc (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2020 07:16:32 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:37558 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728497AbgEELQa (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2020 07:16:30 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD6530E; Tue, 5 May 2020 04:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from C02TD0UTHF1T.local (unknown [10.57.25.241]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11C4A3F305; Tue, 5 May 2020 04:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 12:16:07 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Will Deacon Cc: Anshuman Khandual , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas , Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/16] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2 CPU register Message-ID: <20200505111607.GA82823@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> References: <1588426445-24344-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <1588426445-24344-5-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <20200505111241.GF19710@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200505111241.GF19710@willie-the-truck> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:12:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 07:03:53PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > This adds basic building blocks required for ID_PFR2 CPU register which > > provides information about the AArch32 programmers model which must be > > interpreted along with ID_PFR0 and ID_PFR1 CPU registers. This is added > > per ARM DDI 0487F.a specification. > > > > Cc: Catalin Marinas > > Cc: Will Deacon > > Cc: Marc Zyngier > > Cc: Mark Rutland > > Cc: James Morse > > Cc: Suzuki K Poulose > > Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > Suggested-by: Mark Rutland > > Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose > > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h | 1 + > > arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 4 ++++ > > arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 11 +++++++++++ > > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 1 + > > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 2 +- > > 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h > > index b4a40535a3d8..464e828a994d 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h > > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm64 { > > u32 reg_id_mmfr3; > > u32 reg_id_pfr0; > > u32 reg_id_pfr1; > > + u32 reg_id_pfr2; > > > > u32 reg_mvfr0; > > u32 reg_mvfr1; > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > > index e5317a6367b6..c977449e02db 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > > @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ > > #define SYS_MVFR0_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 0) > > #define SYS_MVFR1_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 1) > > #define SYS_MVFR2_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 2) > > +#define SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 4) > > nit: but please group these defines by name rather than encoding. So far we've *always* grouped these by encoding in this file, so can we keep things that way for now? Otherwise we're inconsistent with both schemes. Mark.