From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FA3C35280 for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 03:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95965208DB for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 03:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726908AbgEJD1L (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2020 23:27:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53294 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726067AbgEJD1L (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 May 2020 23:27:11 -0400 Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13659C061A0C; Sat, 9 May 2020 20:27:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jXccO-004oCo-4n; Sun, 10 May 2020 03:27:08 +0000 Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 04:27:08 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel Subject: Re: [PATCHES] uaccess simple access_ok() removals Message-ID: <20200510032708.GO23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20200509234124.GM23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 05:34:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 4:41 PM Al Viro wrote: > > > > Individual patches in followups; if nobody screams - into #for-next > > it goes... > > Looks fine to me, although I only read your commit logs, I didn't > verify that what you stated was actually true (ie the whole "only used > for xyz" parts). > > But I'll take your word for it. Particularly the double-underscore > versions are getting rare (and presumably some of the other branches > you have make it rarer still). I have - FWIW, right now I'm going through the patch series for netdev; once I'm done with turning commit messages into something printable (and finish rereading the patches themselves), there it goes, hopefully tonight. Then a bunch of small branches + repost of csum one + some of the weird shit (comedi compat ioctls - the largest pile of __get_user() and __put_user() outside of arch/* is festering there). Then regset stuff + (probably) resurrection of i915 stuff. I've got a bunch of stuff around execve(), but that'll have to wait until I get through the recently posted execve-related patchsets... Then there's e.g. mempolicy compat stuff, etc., but I'd rather wait for several days before posting that, reviewers' bandwidth being finite...