linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] mm: Get rid of vmalloc_sync_(un)mappings()
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:02:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512150250.GC8135@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8D6745B7-0EC2-4FCC-B6FC-E7E1557EB18E@amacapital.net>

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:36:19PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I’m guessing the right solution is either your series or your series
> plus preallocation on 64-bit. I’m just grumpy about it...

Okay, so we can do the pre-allocation when it turns out the pgd_list
lock-times become a problem on x86-64. The tracking code in vmalloc.c is
needed anyway for 32-bit and there is no reason why 64-bit shouldn't use
it as well for now.
I don't think that taking the lock _will_ be a problem, as it is only
taken when a new PGD/P4D entry is populated. And it is pretty unlikely
that a system will populate all 64 of them, with 4-level paging each of
these entries will map 512GB of address space. But if I am wrong here
pre-allocating is still an option.


	Joerg

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-12 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-08 14:40 [RFC PATCH 0/7] mm: Get rid of vmalloc_sync_(un)mappings() Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] mm: Add functions to track page directory modifications Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] mm/vmalloc: Track which page-table levels were modified Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 19:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-08 21:23     ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] mm/ioremap: " Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] x86/mm/64: Implement arch_sync_kernel_mappings() Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] x86/mm/32: " Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] mm: Remove vmalloc_sync_(un)mappings() Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 18:58   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-08 21:24     ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] x86/mm: Remove vmalloc faulting Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 19:20 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] mm: Get rid of vmalloc_sync_(un)mappings() Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-08 21:34   ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-09  9:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-09 17:54       ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-10  1:11       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-11  7:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-11 15:52           ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-11 16:08             ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-11 17:02             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-08 21:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-08 21:36   ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-08 23:49     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-09 17:52       ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-09 19:05         ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-09 21:57           ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-10  5:05             ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-10  8:15               ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-11  7:42           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-11 15:36             ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-11 17:06               ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-11 19:14               ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-11 19:36                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-12 15:02                   ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2020-05-12 15:13                     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-11 20:50                 ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200512150250.GC8135@suse.de \
    --to=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).