From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] allow ramoops to collect all kmesg_dump events
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 00:47:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202005130045.EF013D12E@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200513073448.GG7340@linux-b0ei>
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:34:49AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2020-05-12 11:45:54, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Here are the problems I see being solved by this:
> >
> > - lifting kmsg dump reason filtering out of the individual pstore
> > backends and making it part of the "infrastructure", so that
> > there is a central place to set expectations. Right now there
> > is a mix of explicit and implicit kmsg dump handling:
> >
> > - arch/powerpc/kernel/nvram_64.c has a hard-coded list
>
> It handles restart, halt, poweroff the same way. I wonder if anyone
> would want to distinguish them.
>
> > - drivers/firmware/efi/efi-pstore.c doesn't expect anything but
> > OOPS and PANIC.
> > - drivers/mtd/mtdoops.c tries to filter using its own dump_oops
> > and doesn't expect anything but OOPS and PANIC.
> > - fs/pstore/ram.c: has a hard-coded list and uses its own
> > dump_oops.
> > - drivers/mtd/mtdpstore.c (under development[3]) expected only
> > OOPS and PANIC and had its own dump_oops.
>
> The others handle only panic or oops.
>
> What about splitting the reason into two variables? One for severity
> and other for shutdown behavior. I mean:
>
> + reason: panic, oops, emergency, shutdown (ordered by severity)
> + handling: restart, halt, poweroff
>
> Or we might just replace KMSG_DUMP_RESTART, KMSG_DUMP_HALT,
> KMSG_DUMP_POWEROFF with a single KMSG_DUMP_SHUTDOWN.
>
> Then the max reason variable would make sense.
That would work for me, yeah. Pavel, is that enough granularity for you?
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-13 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-06 21:15 [PATCH v3 0/6] allow ramoops to collect all kmesg_dump events Kees Cook
2020-05-06 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] printk: honor the max_reason field in kmsg_dumper Kees Cook
2020-05-06 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] pstore/platform: Pass max_reason to kmesg dump Kees Cook
2020-05-06 21:25 ` Joe Perches
2020-05-06 22:40 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-06 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] pstore/ram: Refactor DT size parsing Kees Cook
2020-05-07 12:57 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-05-07 18:04 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-06 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] pstore/ram: Introduce max_reason and convert dump_oops Kees Cook
2020-05-06 21:17 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-12 23:35 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-05-12 23:57 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-16 2:43 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-06 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ramoops: Add max_reason optional field to ramoops DT node Kees Cook
2020-05-06 21:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] pstore/ram: Adjust module param permissions to reflect reality Kees Cook
2020-05-12 13:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] allow ramoops to collect all kmesg_dump events Petr Mladek
2020-05-12 14:03 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-05-12 15:52 ` Petr Mladek
2020-05-12 16:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-12 16:49 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-05-12 18:53 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-12 18:45 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-13 7:34 ` Petr Mladek
2020-05-13 7:47 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-05-13 14:35 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-05-13 20:15 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202005130045.EF013D12E@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).