[PATCH net-next] hinic: add set_channels ethtool_ops support

[PATCH net-next] hinic: add set_channels ethtool_ops support

[Luo bin]

add support to change TX/RX queue number with ethtool -L

Signed-off-by: Luo bin <luobin9@huawei.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++--
 .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c  |  7 ++
 .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h  |  2 +
 .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c    |  5 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c  |  5 ++
 5 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c
index ace18d258049..92a0e3bd19c3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c
@@ -619,14 +619,68 @@ static void hinic_get_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
 	struct hinic_dev *nic_dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
 	struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev = nic_dev->hwdev;
 
-	channels->max_rx = hwdev->nic_cap.max_qps;
-	channels->max_tx = hwdev->nic_cap.max_qps;
+	channels->max_rx = 0;
+	channels->max_tx = 0;
 	channels->max_other = 0;
-	channels->max_combined = 0;
-	channels->rx_count = hinic_hwdev_num_qps(hwdev);
-	channels->tx_count = hinic_hwdev_num_qps(hwdev);
+	channels->max_combined = nic_dev->max_qps;
+	channels->rx_count = 0;
+	channels->tx_count = 0;
 	channels->other_count = 0;
-	channels->combined_count = 0;
+	channels->combined_count = hinic_hwdev_num_qps(hwdev);
+}
+
+int hinic_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
+		       struct ethtool_channels *channels)
+{
+	struct hinic_dev *nic_dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
+	unsigned int count = channels->combined_count;
+	int err;
+
+	if (!count) {
+		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
+			  "Unsupported combined_count: 0\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (channels->tx_count || channels->rx_count || channels->other_count) {
+		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
+			  "Setting rx/tx/other count not supported\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (!(nic_dev->flags & HINIC_RSS_ENABLE)) {
+		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
+			  "This function doesn't support RSS, only support 1 queue pair\n");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	if (count > nic_dev->max_qps) {
+		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
+			  "Combined count %d exceeds limit %d\n",
+			  count, nic_dev->max_qps);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	netif_info(nic_dev, drv, netdev, "Set max combined queue number from %d to %d\n",
+		   hinic_hwdev_num_qps(nic_dev->hwdev), count);
+
+	if (netif_running(netdev)) {
+		netif_info(nic_dev, drv, netdev, "Restarting netdev\n");
+		hinic_close(netdev);
+
+		hinic_update_num_qps(nic_dev->hwdev, count);
+
+		err = hinic_open(netdev);
+		if (err) {
+			netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
+				  "Failed to open netdev\n");
+			return -EFAULT;
+		}
+	} else {
+		hinic_update_num_qps(nic_dev->hwdev, count);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int hinic_get_rss_hash_opts(struct hinic_dev *nic_dev,
@@ -1219,6 +1273,7 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops hinic_ethtool_ops = {
 	.get_ringparam = hinic_get_ringparam,
 	.set_ringparam = hinic_set_ringparam,
 	.get_channels = hinic_get_channels,
+	.set_channels = hinic_set_channels,
 	.get_rxnfc = hinic_get_rxnfc,
 	.set_rxnfc = hinic_set_rxnfc,
 	.get_rxfh_key_size = hinic_get_rxfh_key_size,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c
index 0245da02efbb..d40a0a5d2c8d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c
@@ -858,6 +858,13 @@ int hinic_hwdev_num_qps(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev)
 	return nic_cap->num_qps;
 }
 
+void hinic_update_num_qps(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev, u16 num_qp)
+{
+	struct hinic_cap *nic_cap = &hwdev->nic_cap;
+
+	nic_cap->num_qps = num_qp;
+}
+
 /**
  * hinic_hwdev_get_sq - get SQ
  * @hwdev: the NIC HW device
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h
index 71ea7e46dbbc..e7dfe5ae2f8b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h
@@ -359,6 +359,8 @@ int hinic_hwdev_max_num_qps(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev);
 
 int hinic_hwdev_num_qps(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev);
 
+void hinic_update_num_qps(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev, u16 num_qp);
+
 struct hinic_sq *hinic_hwdev_get_sq(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev, int i);
 
 struct hinic_rq *hinic_hwdev_get_rq(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev, int i);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c
index e3ff119fe341..5a130c982a02 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c
@@ -326,7 +326,6 @@ static void hinic_enable_rss(struct hinic_dev *nic_dev)
 	int i, node, err = 0;
 	u16 num_cpus = 0;
 
-	nic_dev->max_qps = hinic_hwdev_max_num_qps(hwdev);
 	if (nic_dev->max_qps <= 1) {
 		nic_dev->flags &= ~HINIC_RSS_ENABLE;
 		nic_dev->rss_limit = nic_dev->max_qps;
@@ -1043,6 +1042,10 @@ static int nic_dev_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	nic_dev->rq_depth = HINIC_RQ_DEPTH;
 	nic_dev->sriov_info.hwdev = hwdev;
 	nic_dev->sriov_info.pdev = pdev;
+	nic_dev->max_qps = num_qps;
+
+	if (nic_dev->max_qps > 1)
+		nic_dev->flags |= HINIC_RSS_ENABLE;
 
 	sema_init(&nic_dev->mgmt_lock, 1);
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c
index 4c66a0bc1b28..6da761d7a6ef 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c
@@ -470,6 +470,11 @@ netdev_tx_t hinic_xmit_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
 	struct hinic_txq *txq;
 	struct hinic_qp *qp;
 
+	if (unlikely(!netif_carrier_ok(netdev))) {
+		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
+	}
+
 	txq = &nic_dev->txqs[q_id];
 	qp = container_of(txq->sq, struct hinic_qp, sq);
 
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH net-next] hinic: add set_channels ethtool_ops support

[David Miller]

From: Luo bin <luobin9@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 00:35:47 +0000

> +void hinic_update_num_qps(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev, u16 num_qp)
> +{
> +	struct hinic_cap *nic_cap = &hwdev->nic_cap;
> +
> +	nic_cap->num_qps = num_qp;
> +}

It is excessive to have a helper function that assigns a single struct
member, the layout of which is visible to all callers.  All callers
are also in a single function.

Please remove this helper and just go "hwdev->nic_cap.num_qps = xxx;"
at the call sites.

Thank you.

Re: [PATCH net-next] hinic: add set_channels ethtool_ops support

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Fri, 15 May 2020 00:35:47 +0000 Luo bin wrote:
> add support to change TX/RX queue number with ethtool -L
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luo bin <luobin9@huawei.com>
> ---
>  .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++--
>  .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c  |  7 ++
>  .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h  |  2 +
>  .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c    |  5 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c  |  5 ++
>  5 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c
> index ace18d258049..92a0e3bd19c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c
> @@ -619,14 +619,68 @@ static void hinic_get_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
>  	struct hinic_dev *nic_dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
>  	struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev = nic_dev->hwdev;
>  
> -	channels->max_rx = hwdev->nic_cap.max_qps;
> -	channels->max_tx = hwdev->nic_cap.max_qps;
> +	channels->max_rx = 0;
> +	channels->max_tx = 0;

No need to set members to zero, core passes in a zero-initialized
structure.

>  	channels->max_other = 0;
> -	channels->max_combined = 0;
> -	channels->rx_count = hinic_hwdev_num_qps(hwdev);
> -	channels->tx_count = hinic_hwdev_num_qps(hwdev);
> +	channels->max_combined = nic_dev->max_qps;
> +	channels->rx_count = 0;
> +	channels->tx_count = 0;
>  	channels->other_count = 0;
> -	channels->combined_count = 0;
> +	channels->combined_count = hinic_hwdev_num_qps(hwdev);
> +}
> +
> +int hinic_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
> +		       struct ethtool_channels *channels)

I haven't actually built this, but - static?

> +{
> +	struct hinic_dev *nic_dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +	unsigned int count = channels->combined_count;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (!count) {
> +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
> +			  "Unsupported combined_count: 0\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (channels->tx_count || channels->rx_count || channels->other_count) {
> +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
> +			  "Setting rx/tx/other count not supported\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

Core already checks this:

	if (channels.rx_count > curr.max_rx ||
	    channels.tx_count > curr.max_tx ||
	    channels.combined_count > curr.max_combined ||
	    channels.other_count > curr.max_other)
		return -EINVAL;

> +	if (!(nic_dev->flags & HINIC_RSS_ENABLE)) {
> +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
> +			  "This function doesn't support RSS, only support 1 queue pair\n");
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (count > nic_dev->max_qps) {

same here

> +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
> +			  "Combined count %d exceeds limit %d\n",
> +			  count, nic_dev->max_qps);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	netif_info(nic_dev, drv, netdev, "Set max combined queue number from %d to %d\n",
> +		   hinic_hwdev_num_qps(nic_dev->hwdev), count);
> +
> +	if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> +		netif_info(nic_dev, drv, netdev, "Restarting netdev\n");
> +		hinic_close(netdev);
> +
> +		hinic_update_num_qps(nic_dev->hwdev, count);
> +
> +		err = hinic_open(netdev);
> +		if (err) {
> +			netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
> +				  "Failed to open netdev\n");
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		hinic_update_num_qps(nic_dev->hwdev, count);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int hinic_get_rss_hash_opts(struct hinic_dev *nic_dev,
> @@ -1219,6 +1273,7 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops hinic_ethtool_ops = {
>  	.get_ringparam = hinic_get_ringparam,
>  	.set_ringparam = hinic_set_ringparam,
>  	.get_channels = hinic_get_channels,
> +	.set_channels = hinic_set_channels,
>  	.get_rxnfc = hinic_get_rxnfc,
>  	.set_rxnfc = hinic_set_rxnfc,
>  	.get_rxfh_key_size = hinic_get_rxfh_key_size,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c
> index 0245da02efbb..d40a0a5d2c8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c
> @@ -858,6 +858,13 @@ int hinic_hwdev_num_qps(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev)
>  	return nic_cap->num_qps;
>  }
>  
> +void hinic_update_num_qps(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev, u16 num_qp)
> +{
> +	struct hinic_cap *nic_cap = &hwdev->nic_cap;
> +
> +	nic_cap->num_qps = num_qp;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * hinic_hwdev_get_sq - get SQ
>   * @hwdev: the NIC HW device
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h
> index 71ea7e46dbbc..e7dfe5ae2f8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h
> @@ -359,6 +359,8 @@ int hinic_hwdev_max_num_qps(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev);
>  
>  int hinic_hwdev_num_qps(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev);
>  
> +void hinic_update_num_qps(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev, u16 num_qp);
> +
>  struct hinic_sq *hinic_hwdev_get_sq(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev, int i);
>  
>  struct hinic_rq *hinic_hwdev_get_rq(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev, int i);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c
> index e3ff119fe341..5a130c982a02 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c
> @@ -326,7 +326,6 @@ static void hinic_enable_rss(struct hinic_dev *nic_dev)
>  	int i, node, err = 0;
>  	u16 num_cpus = 0;
>  
> -	nic_dev->max_qps = hinic_hwdev_max_num_qps(hwdev);
>  	if (nic_dev->max_qps <= 1) {
>  		nic_dev->flags &= ~HINIC_RSS_ENABLE;
>  		nic_dev->rss_limit = nic_dev->max_qps;
> @@ -1043,6 +1042,10 @@ static int nic_dev_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	nic_dev->rq_depth = HINIC_RQ_DEPTH;
>  	nic_dev->sriov_info.hwdev = hwdev;
>  	nic_dev->sriov_info.pdev = pdev;
> +	nic_dev->max_qps = num_qps;
> +
> +	if (nic_dev->max_qps > 1)
> +		nic_dev->flags |= HINIC_RSS_ENABLE;
>  
>  	sema_init(&nic_dev->mgmt_lock, 1);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c
> index 4c66a0bc1b28..6da761d7a6ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c
> @@ -470,6 +470,11 @@ netdev_tx_t hinic_xmit_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev)
>  	struct hinic_txq *txq;
>  	struct hinic_qp *qp;
>  
> +	if (unlikely(!netif_carrier_ok(netdev))) {
> +		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> +		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> +	}

Why do you need this? How is it supposed to be synchronized in the first
place, the link can go down two instructions after you do the check.

>  	txq = &nic_dev->txqs[q_id];
>  	qp = container_of(txq->sq, struct hinic_qp, sq);
>  

Re: [PATCH net-next] hinic: add set_channels ethtool_ops support

[Michal Kubecek]

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:35:47AM +0000, Luo bin wrote:
> add support to change TX/RX queue number with ethtool -L
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luo bin <luobin9@huawei.com>
> ---
>  .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++--
>  .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c  |  7 ++
>  .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h  |  2 +
>  .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c    |  5 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c  |  5 ++
>  5 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c
> index ace18d258049..92a0e3bd19c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c
> @@ -619,14 +619,68 @@ static void hinic_get_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
>  	struct hinic_dev *nic_dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
>  	struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev = nic_dev->hwdev;
>  
> -	channels->max_rx = hwdev->nic_cap.max_qps;
> -	channels->max_tx = hwdev->nic_cap.max_qps;
> +	channels->max_rx = 0;
> +	channels->max_tx = 0;
>  	channels->max_other = 0;
> -	channels->max_combined = 0;
> -	channels->rx_count = hinic_hwdev_num_qps(hwdev);
> -	channels->tx_count = hinic_hwdev_num_qps(hwdev);
> +	channels->max_combined = nic_dev->max_qps;
> +	channels->rx_count = 0;
> +	channels->tx_count = 0;
>  	channels->other_count = 0;
> -	channels->combined_count = 0;
> +	channels->combined_count = hinic_hwdev_num_qps(hwdev);
> +}
> +
> +int hinic_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
> +		       struct ethtool_channels *channels)
> +{
> +	struct hinic_dev *nic_dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +	unsigned int count = channels->combined_count;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (!count) {
> +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
> +			  "Unsupported combined_count: 0\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (channels->tx_count || channels->rx_count || channels->other_count) {
> +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
> +			  "Setting rx/tx/other count not supported\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

With max_* reported as 0, these will be caught in ethnl_set_channels()
or ethtool_set_channels().

> +	if (!(nic_dev->flags & HINIC_RSS_ENABLE)) {
> +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
> +			  "This function doesn't support RSS, only support 1 queue pair\n");
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	}

I'm not sure if the request should fail even if requested count is
actually 1.

> +	if (count > nic_dev->max_qps) {
> +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
> +			  "Combined count %d exceeds limit %d\n",
> +			  count, nic_dev->max_qps);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

As above, this check has been already performed in ethnl_set_channels()
or ethtool_set_channels().

> +	netif_info(nic_dev, drv, netdev, "Set max combined queue number from %d to %d\n",
> +		   hinic_hwdev_num_qps(nic_dev->hwdev), count);

We have netlink notifications now, is it necessary to log successful
changes?

Michal

Re: [PATCH net-next] hinic: add set_channels ethtool_ops support

[Michal Kubecek]

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:13:30PM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
[...]
> > +int hinic_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
> > +		       struct ethtool_channels *channels)
> > +{
> > +	struct hinic_dev *nic_dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > +	unsigned int count = channels->combined_count;
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	if (!count) {
> > +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
> > +			  "Unsupported combined_count: 0\n");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (channels->tx_count || channels->rx_count || channels->other_count) {
> > +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
> > +			  "Setting rx/tx/other count not supported\n");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> 
> With max_* reported as 0, these will be caught in ethnl_set_channels()
> or ethtool_set_channels().
> 
> > +	if (!(nic_dev->flags & HINIC_RSS_ENABLE)) {
> > +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
> > +			  "This function doesn't support RSS, only support 1 queue pair\n");
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +	}
> 
> I'm not sure if the request should fail even if requested count is
> actually 1.

Thinking about it again, as long as you report max_combined=1 in this
case, anything higher than 1 would be rejected by general ethtool code
and 0 is rejected by the first check above so that you can in fact only
get here for combined_count=1 - and only for ioctl requests as netlink
code path won't call the ethtool_ops callback if there is no change.

Michal

Re: [PATCH net-next] hinic: add set_channels ethtool_ops support

[luobin (L)]

On 2020/5/16 2:13, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:35:47AM +0000, Luo bin wrote:
>> add support to change TX/RX queue number with ethtool -L
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luo bin <luobin9@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++--
>>   .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c  |  7 ++
>>   .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h  |  2 +
>>   .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c    |  5 +-
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c  |  5 ++
>>   5 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c
>> index ace18d258049..92a0e3bd19c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c
>> @@ -619,14 +619,68 @@ static void hinic_get_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
>>   	struct hinic_dev *nic_dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>   	struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev = nic_dev->hwdev;
>>   
>> -	channels->max_rx = hwdev->nic_cap.max_qps;
>> -	channels->max_tx = hwdev->nic_cap.max_qps;
>> +	channels->max_rx = 0;
>> +	channels->max_tx = 0;
>>   	channels->max_other = 0;
>> -	channels->max_combined = 0;
>> -	channels->rx_count = hinic_hwdev_num_qps(hwdev);
>> -	channels->tx_count = hinic_hwdev_num_qps(hwdev);
>> +	channels->max_combined = nic_dev->max_qps;
>> +	channels->rx_count = 0;
>> +	channels->tx_count = 0;
>>   	channels->other_count = 0;
>> -	channels->combined_count = 0;
>> +	channels->combined_count = hinic_hwdev_num_qps(hwdev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int hinic_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
>> +		       struct ethtool_channels *channels)
>> +{
>> +	struct hinic_dev *nic_dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
>> +	unsigned int count = channels->combined_count;
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	if (!count) {
>> +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
>> +			  "Unsupported combined_count: 0\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (channels->tx_count || channels->rx_count || channels->other_count) {
>> +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
>> +			  "Setting rx/tx/other count not supported\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
> With max_* reported as 0, these will be caught in ethnl_set_channels()
> or ethtool_set_channels().
> ---Will fix. Thanks
>> +	if (!(nic_dev->flags & HINIC_RSS_ENABLE)) {
>> +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
>> +			  "This function doesn't support RSS, only support 1 queue pair\n");
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	}
> I'm not sure if the request should fail even if requested count is
> actually 1.
>
>> +	if (count > nic_dev->max_qps) {
>> +		netif_err(nic_dev, drv, netdev,
>> +			  "Combined count %d exceeds limit %d\n",
>> +			  count, nic_dev->max_qps);
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
> As above, this check has been already performed in ethnl_set_channels()
> or ethtool_set_channels().
> ---Will fix. Thanks
>> +	netif_info(nic_dev, drv, netdev, "Set max combined queue number from %d to %d\n",
>> +		   hinic_hwdev_num_qps(nic_dev->hwdev), count);
> We have netlink notifications now, is it necessary to log successful
> changes?
> ---I think it contributes to locating defects for developers.
>
> Michal
> .