[PATCH 4.19 07/80] scsi: sg: add sg_remove_request in sg_write

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

From: Wu Bo <wubo40@huawei.com>

commit 83c6f2390040f188cc25b270b4befeb5628c1aee upstream.

If the __copy_from_user function failed we need to call sg_remove_request
in sg_write.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/610618d9-e983-fd56-ed0f-639428343af7@huawei.com
Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <wubo40@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[groeck: Backport to v5.4.y and older kernels]
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/scsi/sg.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/scsi/sg.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
@@ -694,8 +694,10 @@ sg_write(struct file *filp, const char _
 	hp->flags = input_size;	/* structure abuse ... */
 	hp->pack_id = old_hdr.pack_id;
 	hp->usr_ptr = NULL;
-	if (__copy_from_user(cmnd, buf, cmd_size))
+	if (__copy_from_user(cmnd, buf, cmd_size)) {
+		sg_remove_request(sfp, srp);
 		return -EFAULT;
+	}
 	/*
 	 * SG_DXFER_TO_FROM_DEV is functionally equivalent to SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV,
 	 * but is is possible that the app intended SG_DXFER_TO_DEV, because there