From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clean up and streamline probe_kernel_* and friends v2
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 07:50:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200519055009.GB23853@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10c58b09-5ece-e49f-a7c8-2aa6dfd22fb4@iogearbox.net>
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 01:04:38AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Aside from comments on list, the series looks reasonable to me. For BPF
> the bpf_probe_read() helper would be slightly penalized for probing user
> memory given we now test on copy_from_kernel_nofault() first and if that
> fails only then fall back to copy_from_user_nofault(), but it seems
> small enough that it shouldn't matter too much and aside from that we have
> the newer bpf_probe_read_kernel() and bpf_probe_read_user() anyway that
> BPF progs should use instead, so I think it's okay.
>
> For patch 14 and patch 15, do you roughly know the performance gain with
> the new probe_kernel_read_loop() + arch_kernel_read() approach?
I don't think there should be any measurable difference in performance
for typical use cases. We'll save the stac/clac pair, but that's it.
The real eason is to avoid that stac/clac pair that opens up a window
for explots, and as a significant enabler for killing of set_fs based
address limit overrides entirely.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-13 16:00 clean up and streamline probe_kernel_* and friends v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 01/18] maccess: unexport probe_kernel_write and probe_user_write Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 02/18] maccess: remove various unused weak aliases Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 03/18] maccess: remove duplicate kerneldoc comments Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 04/18] maccess: clarify " Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 05/18] maccess: update the top of file comment Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 06/18] maccess: rename strncpy_from_unsafe_user to strncpy_from_user_nofault Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 07/18] maccess: rename strncpy_from_unsafe_strict to strncpy_from_kernel_nofault Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 08/18] maccess: rename strnlen_unsafe_user to strnlen_user_nofault Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 09/18] maccess: remove probe_read_common and probe_write_common Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 10/18] maccess: unify the probe kernel arch hooks Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-14 1:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-05-19 5:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 11/18] maccess: remove strncpy_from_unsafe Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-13 19:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 22:36 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-05-13 23:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-13 23:24 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-05-13 23:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-05-13 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-14 1:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-05-14 2:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-14 9:44 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-05-14 10:27 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-05-13 23:28 ` Al Viro
2020-05-13 23:58 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-05-14 10:01 ` David Laight
2020-05-14 10:21 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 12/18] maccess: always use strict semantics for probe_kernel_read Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 13/18] maccess: move user access routines together Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 14/18] maccess: allow architectures to provide kernel probing directly Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-13 19:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 19:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-13 19:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-16 3:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-05-18 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 15/18] x86: use non-set_fs based maccess routines Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 16/18] maccess: rename probe_kernel_{read,write} to copy_{from,to}_kernel_nofault Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 17/18] maccess: rename probe_user_{read,write} to copy_{from,to}_user_nofault Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 16:00 ` [PATCH 18/18] maccess: rename probe_kernel_address to get_kernel_nofault Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 19:37 ` clean up and streamline probe_kernel_* and friends v2 Linus Torvalds
2020-05-13 23:04 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-05-13 23:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-19 5:50 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200519055009.GB23853@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).