From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E4AC433E0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 11:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F8320708 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 11:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="kqA8ASBu" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728784AbgESLQc (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 07:16:32 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:33390 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726157AbgESLQc (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 07:16:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=0LhBPYF7Etu/FHeJftm3ehboKFuLvunUInUXuPg2u/A=; b=kqA8ASBuk6KBuEoEi1C0hnnNXH QgR5oL5CfN2Tkb8qDZbH7J0JhNz71FE/de7R0sg0cM1kO+jTnIJv9spy3KQPKDtb4OpugxPd+jkma e+Gw9KW7GQQSmiq4CwdVjxz4wtCjaQ82qD8yWASOLxGb7S+CbbKLqpJe6TdVWzclYi5TYot3WLtNs jdDP/3tucZrk7BFA9YfXdZdj8bQHDLCDrpJejYdXxjcehuQkcNbCYhiSmiMMf+DwM+U5vI5HLP1Wf n5U320t9+x9Q8AoxPqQRSRvQZXV+usfodcy6q1Ba2J/bKjb2pWggwEjSi+7H7wR6PnWKgZ65qkpTp /aAvmHBw==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jb0E6-0005rZ-10; Tue, 19 May 2020 11:16:02 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF10301A80; Tue, 19 May 2020 13:16:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 08BBA2B7E294F; Tue, 19 May 2020 13:15:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 13:15:59 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Like Xu Cc: Paolo Bonzini , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Thomas Gleixner , ak@linux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 10/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Check guest LBR availability in case host reclaims them Message-ID: <20200519111559.GJ279861@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20200514083054.62538-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com> <20200514083054.62538-11-like.xu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200514083054.62538-11-like.xu@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 04:30:53PM +0800, Like Xu wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c > index ea4faae56473..db185dca903d 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c > @@ -646,6 +646,43 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > intel_pmu_free_lbr_event(vcpu); > } > > +static bool intel_pmu_lbr_is_availabile(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +{ > + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu); > + > + if (!pmu->lbr_event) > + return false; > + > + if (event_is_oncpu(pmu->lbr_event)) { > + intel_pmu_intercept_lbr_msrs(vcpu, false); > + } else { > + intel_pmu_intercept_lbr_msrs(vcpu, true); > + return false; > + } > + > + return true; > +} This is unreadable gunk, what? > +/* > + * Higher priority host perf events (e.g. cpu pinned) could reclaim the > + * pmu resources (e.g. LBR) that were assigned to the guest. This is > + * usually done via ipi calls (more details in perf_install_in_context). > + * > + * Before entering the non-root mode (with irq disabled here), double > + * confirm that the pmu features enabled to the guest are not reclaimed > + * by higher priority host events. Otherwise, disallow vcpu's access to > + * the reclaimed features. > + */ > +static void intel_pmu_availability_check(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +{ > + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled(); > + > + if (lbr_is_enabled(vcpu) && !intel_pmu_lbr_is_availabile(vcpu) && > + (vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL) & DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR)) > + pr_warn_ratelimited("kvm: vcpu-%d: LBR is temporarily unavailable.\n", > + vcpu->vcpu_id); More unreadable nonsense; when the events go into ERROR state, it's a permanent fail, they'll not come back. > +} > + > struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops = { > .find_arch_event = intel_find_arch_event, > .find_fixed_event = intel_find_fixed_event, > @@ -662,4 +699,5 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops = { > .reset = intel_pmu_reset, > .deliver_pmi = intel_pmu_deliver_pmi, > .lbr_cleanup = intel_pmu_lbr_cleanup, > + .availability_check = intel_pmu_availability_check, > }; > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > index 9969d663826a..80d036c5f64a 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > @@ -6696,8 +6696,10 @@ static fastpath_t vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > pt_guest_enter(vmx); > > - if (vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu)->version) > + if (vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu)->version) { > atomic_switch_perf_msrs(vmx); > + kvm_x86_ops.pmu_ops->availability_check(vcpu); > + } AFAICT you just did a call out to the kvm_pmu crud in atomic_switch_perf_msrs(), why do another call?