From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the drm-misc tree
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 16:16:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200519161647.32403208@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 792 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
between commit:
a4292e52106b ("drm: Match drm_dp_send_clear_payload_id_table definition to declaration")
from the drm-misc tree and commit:
53965dbe5396 ("drm: Make drm_dp_mst_dsc_aux_for_port() safe for old compilers")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (I used the former) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200519161647.32403208@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).